Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The effects of Thursday Night games - would it benefit the Panthers to just forfeit?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm just spitballing here, but let's go back in time and speculate how different each Panthers season would be from 2018 onward, if they forfeited every Thursday Night game.

2018: Steelers Massacre. This game individually ruined the Panthers 2018 season. Cam Newton's shoulder was probably destroyed for good in this game and the defense was completely decimated. If the Panthers don't play this game, their season might still end up similarly, but who knows? This completely destroyed all confidence for that team.

2019: Cam's last game as a Panther. The Bucs came to Charlotte and beat the Panthers on a rainy night in Cam's last game as a Panther. The end of the game was sadly ended on a fake QB sneak to CMC, which was stopped short of the goal line. It was a miserable way for Cam to end his time with the Panthers. If this game doesn't happen, does Cam get more time to heal up and continue playing that season? 

2020: Atlanta embarrasses the Panthers. This game looked a lot like the games of 2021, with the Panthers looking good early in the game and falling apart late. If this game doesn't happen, I'm not sure much changes with the season honestly. Donte Jackson went down in this game for awhile and the team continued to decline after this.

2021: A losing streak begins before the game was even over. CMC, Jaycee Horn, and Juston Burris are all injured in a win over the Texans that really felt more like a loss. The Panthers still haven't recovered from the injuries in this game.

So let's just speculate, let's say the Panthers never play any of these games. How different are their seasons? 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not the craziest thing in the world to consider doing. Players need time to recover, plain and simple. If a team told the league they weren't playing a Thursday game in the interest of player safety, expect some serious backlash from the league. That's a lot of revenue lost and there is no way Goodell let's that go unpunished. What happened to Cam in SB50 and the season opener in 16 would be a walk in the park. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be real in hindsight you'd just take the L and keep the health. I mean if the players cared enough about it to protest there are things that they could do. The players don't seem to care enough honestly...I mean they do have to sign the CBA and all that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its something that the players and coaches need to seriously consider.  It seems no team gets out of a Thursday night unscathed.  Why risk it?? especially now that you have an extra game in the season, you can account for the loss and hopefully make it up down the road.  

Richard Sherman preached hard on how bad it is to have those games and I'm sure he is the silent majority on that.  

Edited by Dunn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

The NFL should work in teams that are coming off of a bye week into these games. It's the only way to reduce the strain on the players. They obviously don't want to reduce the amount of TV time because it makes them money.

Most logical way to move forward.  Start Thursday night games Week 7 with teams coming out of a bye.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So full disclosure - I actually STARTED this post wanting to post stats about how much more players are injured on TNF and then rant and rave about player safety / snuffing TNF / pillorying whoever's idea it was / manning the torpedos etc.  I still think we should get rid of TNF and I still don't think it's generally good football but uh - that stat waving thing fell through.

What I DID manage to find was people citing *lower* injury rates on TNF vs Sunday and Monday games (Here is an example if anyone is curious) so that fugs up THAT rant.  Thanks numbers.

So yeah.  To the original question?  Yeah fug it - I'd take the L every year and skip the game if I could.  This team, specifically, is still snakebit on TNF and I hate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it would be hilarious if we just didn't show up to the next one, like it's not even worth it, even at if it's at home. 

Thursdays are just bad football nights, most of the games are complete ass. Not enough preparation, not enough time to heal up...all to be rushed out for a crap product and a late night I don't need. I don't watch any other Thursday night games or Monday night games anymore, just not worth it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here is how I see it: Hendrickson is 4-5 years past the normal prime for an edge rusher.  However, the smart, elite edge rushers can play into their 30s.  So we would be taking a risk against the odds.  I see him as an elite, smart player,  but in 2025, he only played an average of 15 snaps per game.   We'd be paying him about 1.5 million per game, or $100,000 per snap at that rate. Hendrickson is 270, which makes him a guy who can rush inside or outside, hold the edge, and thus, be productive vs. the pass or run.   We have 2 guys (Scourton and Jones II) who do that pretty well.  Jones' salary is $10m.   I see our need as a pass-rushing specialist, hoping that Princely picks up that role rotationally at least, in 2026. Here is what AI says about age, and it does not lie: An NFL edge rusher's prime typically falls between ages 24 and 28, with peak production often seen around 27, though elite players maintain high production into their early 30s, with some legends excelling even later, demonstrating that while decline can start, great pass rushers defy age norms and can sustain elite play.  Peak Production Trends Early 20s (21-23): Players develop, with younger cohorts showing less immediate impact, but 23-year-olds often show significant pressure generation. Mid-to-Late 20s (24-28): This is the sweet spot, with the 27-year-old age group frequently leading the league in pressures and elite seasons occurring in this window. Early 30s (30+): While some decline begins, many top edge rushers remain highly effective, with stars like T.J. Watt and Myles Garrett demonstrating exceptional play well past 30, defying the average career trajectory.  Key Factors Physicality & Technique: Edge rushers need strength and speed, but mastery of pass-rush moves often develops later, allowing for sustained success. Individual Variation: Elite players like Bruce Smith and T.J. Watt show that exceptional talent and health can extend prime years significantly, with some even having more sacks after 30 than before. 
    • I just watched several nfl players break it down and this is NOT the case DJ was running a 20 yard out breaking crosser, he was supposed to flatten that route out.
    • Remember how we fired a coach for continuously taking us to the playoffs, but falling short of the Super Bowl?  No? Me either.
×
×
  • Create New...