Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Week 6 Pass Blocking grades


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yes, but due to voided years on his contract, we still pay him after he's out the door.  Ouch and DOUBLE ouch.

This is one of the rare times I just don't care about having to pay someone to not play.  And I'm not really one for calling for jobs normally - but fug that guy.  Seriously.  He can pound sand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, onmyown said:

He should have never been signed to top 10 C pay. He was injured. Stated injury still affected him over and over. The Broncos let him go for a reason. Big men don’t heal. Yet Hurney swoops in stumbling over himself with a ridiculous contract.

All of our GMs obsess over spending top dollar on trash linemen in FA. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

How many times has this franchise given golden parachute deals to shitty players who should have been out of the league after their previous stop?

 

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Darnold is ass too.

I honestly don't feel bad for him. How many people can say they've gotten wealthy from a job they're terrible at? 

CarefreePlayfulEastrussiancoursinghounds

Hmmm, I thought this was a historically bad take.  I mean Hurney funded a lot of retirement plans for marginal/injury-riddled/washed up players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Erving played well considering he was beside Jordan.

Did he play well or did he catch a break?  Why go around the edge when you can apply pressure straight up the gut?   I say we move Erving to LG, Moton to LT and Christensen to RT.    You can only continue to beat your head against the wall so many times before real damage is done.  Stop the freaking insanity!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Did he play well or did he catch a break?  Why go around the edge when you can apply pressure straight up the gut?   I say we move Erving to LG, Moton to LT and Christensen to RT.    You can only continue to beat your head against the wall so many times before real damage is done.  Stop the freaking insanity!

Moton looked awful on the left. 

Erving to LG, and Christensen to LT. Keep Moton on the right.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

Did he play well or did he catch a break?  Why go around the edge when you can apply pressure straight up the gut?   I say we move Erving to LG, Moton to LT and Christensen to RT.    You can only continue to beat your head against the wall so many times before real damage is done.  Stop the freaking insanity!

Honestly he has played decent all year. Looks like Miller is still capable so I agree with getting BC out there. Moton, Erving, BC, Miller, and Elf (if healthy) should be out there playing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

No wonder when Sam has to bail, he does so to the right side of the line.  Yikes!

Actually a lot of his bail outs have been to his left, which compromises his throwing ability downfield.  They should design roll outs to the right, as he does often make good throws on the run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can work with the right side. I think we could work with it overall if not for Paradis. I tried to tell people this spring but most seemed to think center was good for some delusional reason. I could almost look past the Erving and Elflein contracts if we hadn't gambled the middle of the line on Paradis and Tecklenburg. But to do all of this with Sam Darnold is just asking for trouble and here we are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...