Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Matt Rhule Shuts Down College Rumors


CarolinaLivin
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

He talks a lot, too much. How much is believable….who knows 

I believe he will get it done.  I get disappointed just like everyone else but I've never tried to throw this team under the bus.  What he said his conference to shut down the rumors of him leaving, I believe.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sir Big Spurr said:

I swear, this place is filled with the most miserable people I’ve ever seen. Rhule has been successful everywhere he’s ever been. He will be successful here too unless you crazies get your way. 

7 winning seasons. It's always been this way. This isn't a perennial contender year in and year out and until that changes this is what you get it's no different for other franchises in similar circumstances.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hold on let me get my Rhule translator working... here it goes:

”I have one of the worst jobs you can have. I left a terrible program at Baylor with a short term contract with bad people for a place to come here. I built two football programs, and when I say I that’s me, and I built two terrible football programs and didn’t really want to try it in the NFL. We went through a sh!tty first year not like I expected. We are in the middle of a second year thats back and forth and exactly where we want to be but you should say you like to build and then inherit something. We aren’t building anything. I hope every guy in here doesn’t think I’m in here for the long haul because I don’t want to do anything. I don’t really give a fug when I take the elevator every day and see those two championship trophies. Like these fans, these people, everybody but me wants to bring a Super Bowl trophy here, because it’s hard to do. That’s not one of the reasons I came here, I don’t want to be a part of that. I could really give fug about fulfilling this mission that was started in 1995,1996. We haven’t done it yet, and don’t hold your breath because it’s only going to happen on accident with a little effort as possible.”.

Sounds about normal .

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...