Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Deadline is Tomorrow, Who do we buy, who do we sell?


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, BlackPanther21_ said:

DJ Moore? No way. Only way I would trade him is if it was for a franchise QB like Watson, and even then I would be hesitant. He's the best receiver we had since 89 in terms of overall talent.

Yet we will have to pay him while trying to build a line and finding a QB. We need now picks not now players. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

It doesn't have to be that hard.  We could just....get a real functional QB.  Darnold isn't even a Trubisky, Menshew, Tyrod, Daniel Jones caliber QB.    Not asking for Rodgers or Watson.  Just someone who should be on a NFL field.

 

If we got you know a real functional OC it would work too. You know one that could score more than 3 points on a good drive. Either way DJ would get us draft capital that could be used on OL and QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would you trade CMC today with the Titans for their 1st round pick  next year . It would unload a big contract and give us two first next year .  We are not going to make the playoffs this year and Fits could fix our QB situation or O-line with these picks . Hubbard and Ameer seems to do a good job and not as expensive ,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't believe it's as easy as saying that anyone believes that Rico had the 10th best day on offense. Grades are done in a vacuum inasmuch as they can be. By their very nature, skill positions are always going to account for more "production" in reference to stats, and RBs perhaps even more than WRs because they touch the ball more. You can't look at PFF's grading system, or any football grading/grading system (like perhaps Football Outsiders or Next Gen Stats), so simplistically. If a player has an excellent day, relative to his position, relative to his assignments, and relative to his number of snaps, then he should be graded highly. It's up to the reader (or the analyst, if you will) to put what you're seeing into context, and that's not only in relation to the grades, but the general situation (like whether a player is playing injured, who they're playing with or against---the general situation). Even the fact that (presumably) PFF or news outlets put out a list of the highest and lowest grades, that doesn't mean that said players were the most impactful of the day, it just means that they did or didn't do their job the best, based upon a certain set of parameters. PFF is a part of life for football analysts, talking heads, execs, coaches, players, and even fans (even if indirectly), all to varying degrees. It is a tool that is used by all 32 teams. Obviously it's not viewed so dismissively by franchises as a whole. Execs obviously don't look at it as a bunch of bozos making sh¡t up on the fly. Fans can berate it or swear by it, but it isn't going anywhere.  The only thing that I can tell you is that perspective and context matters.
    • Im not big in to PFF but their guys were raving about his blocking along with our other skill players in the run game. https://youtu.be/D4kL_N97cFQ?si=sJWSZCUA1bj5otyx  
×
×
  • Create New...