Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CAM NEWTON IS NOT THE ANSWER. THIS IS A MISTAKE.


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

It's poetic irony how the once proud faction of Huddle "realists" have now become what they hate the most: *gasp* Sunshine Pumpers!!!!

I mean Cam is obviously not the answer...but hell I am just hoping for some exciting football which we have been sorely lacking for several consecutive weeks.

That all depends on what the question is….

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Borat said:

The only downside is this probably prevents the Panthers from going QB in the draft, but honestly their D is good enough that it was probably going to keep them away from a premium pick anyways.

They had and still need to go all offensive line.

Edited by Monrowed
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Oh there are plenty of them in the 31 page Cam thread. Bitching about the Super Bowl, how he isn't elite, ruining our draft pick, blah, blah, blah.

is a shitter draft pick really anti cam tho? is it not valid? are you still celebrating Rivera’s moral wins vs saints third stringers when we could’ve had a franchise qb?

if we somehow defy history and go to playoffs i will %100 celebrate this move

but for now I don’t see how what obviously appears to be a successful PR move and dropping in the draft as anti cam

least it will be entertaining and no qbs in the draft anyways I suppose

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, onmyown said:

is a shitter draft pick really anti cam tho? is it not valid? are you still celebrating Rivera’s moral wins vs saints third stringers when we could’ve had a franchise qb?

if we somehow defy history and go to playoffs i will %100 celebrate this move

but for now I don’t see how what obviously appears to be a successful PR move and dropping in the draft as anti cam

least it will be entertaining

Having a high draft pick might have made sense in 2020 because of the strength of that QB class(not that it mattered because we had a chance and passed on two of them). 

This class is not that way. If you want a QB of relatively the same quality, they should be available for the first two rounds(at least). 

We might miss out on other elite prospects in the top 10(or we still might end up with a top 10 pick) but the odds of us losing out were a little bit of a longshot, regardless.

As long as we have a 1st round pick, we should be able to snag a starting caliber player, regardless of where it is. Especially with our main needs being QB and OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IDGAF how he performs, we were going down the sh*tter anyway, might as well do it with the most iconic player this franchise has ever had (sans Mills). This move has single handily revived my enthusiasm for the rest of season, regardless if we win or lose. CAM FUGGIN NEWTON IS BACK!!!!!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Saw this show up in my new feed. Nice to see a couple of our rookies making it into the top 5 so far, even if it is a pff measure... From https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-top-15-rookies-week-9-2025 ... 4. TE Mitchell Evans, Carolina Panthers (78.7) Evans struggled in the Panthers’ tight win over the Packers, finishing with a 41.8 PFF overall grade — third worst among tight ends this week. He was not targeted in the game and played only one snap in pass protection. He did log 15 run-blocking snaps, and although he earned a 68.9 PFF run-blocking grade in zone looks (seven snaps), his 39.0 mark in gap schemes (second worst for the week) dragged him down to a 46.6 PFF run-blocking grade overall — sixth worst for the week. Despite seeing zero targets over his past two games, Evans still leads the Carolina tight end group with a 74.3 PFF receiving grade. He has caught all nine of his targets for 90 yards, six first downs and two touchdowns. Evans also leads the Panthers’ tight end group in PFF run-blocking grade (72.2). He has recorded a 20.5% positive play rate across 175 snaps.  5. WR Tetairoa McMillan, Carolina Panthers (78.6) McMillan had a better day against the Packers, recording four catches for 46 yards. Most of that production came in the first quarter via two 16-yard catches — one of which he snatched from Carrington Valentine’s hands, who was in perfect position to break up the pass. McMillan accounted for three first downs on the day, although Green Bay was able to limit his impact after the catch, holding him to 0.8 yards after the catch per reception. McMillan now has 41 catches for 558 yards — a top-15 mark. He is also tied for second with 19 explosive gains of 15-plus yards. Three of McMillan’s catches against the Packers came between the numbers, bringing him to 22 for 318 yards and 19 first downs (tied for second most) this season. He owns a 26.1% threat rate and a 76.6 PFF receiving grade between the numbers. He also ranks in the top 10 in explosive gains (10) and yards after the catch per reception (5.5) within that area of the field. 
    • At least we don't need to hear overreacting about towels ...
    • Actually there is, try being a Charlotte Hornets fan. I mean the team fuging moved at its peak and hasn't recovered since and that was 25 years ago
×
×
  • Create New...