Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitterer says " We'll have to do something with Sam. "

Zod

By Zod,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted

The only reason we wouldn't make an offer for Watson when trading resumes is if Cam blows up and plays at a high level for the remainder of this season. If Cam plays poorly, then a good offer will be made for Watson. The Panthers clearly don't want to wait around until the 2024 draft to find a QB, and I don't either. Make it happen with Cam, or make it happen with Watson. Otherwise turn off the tv on Sunday because we are many seasons away from having anything decent on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KatsAzz Grand Master

KatsAzz

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

Robby just needs to catch some passes and shut up. If he doesn't, there's a bench with his name on it and no one will cry.

 

I would like to trade Robby and his attitude while his value is somewhat high. Plus,he is so pencil thin i shutter every time he is tackled, just hoping he gets up.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I would like to trade Robby and his attitude while his value is somewhat high. Plus,he is so pencil thin i shutter every time he is tackled, just hoping he gets up.

Robby's "attitude?" 

You do realize he has basically been the only one showing any real emotion when the offense isn't playing well, right? So, you would rather get rid of the guy that isn't just sitting down and taking it? 

That's like saying you would want to dump Cam or Steve Smith because they have an "attitude" problem on the sidelines.

I can understand the frustration with his performances but not the shots at his "attitude."

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Robby's "attitude?" 

You do realize he has basically been the only one showing any real emotion when the offense isn't playing well, right? So, you would rather get rid of the guy that isn't just sitting down and taking it? 

That's like saying you would want to dump Cam or Steve Smith because they have an "attitude" problem on the sidelines.

I can understand the frustration with his performances but not the shots at his "attitude."

Watch Robby go off last half of the season with cam. 
 

I know Robby has played abysmal with drops but Sam hasn’t given him ANY opportunities to play better. Dude has been open. I still think this is more of a Sam problem then Robby problem. Hope we cut Sam and bring in a capable backup and cam signs a multi year deal to stabilize this offense until we can draft the future and have Cam mentor him. What we should’ve done from day 1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...