Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

A couple in interesting Cam things from nfl.com


ladypanther
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Catsfan69 said:

I've listened to it.

He didn't say he created a toxic locker room.

He said he was hard on Cam and they were afraid Cam would be stunted by it.

That Steve held people to the same high standards he held himself too and that it was going to be hard on you if you didn't meet them.

That Steve wanted to win Now and Cam being a rookie was making too many mistakes. 

 

And I can guarantee you this Cam was complicit in that situation. There are clips on the sideline of Steve trying to teach Cam and Cam completely ignoring him like some entitled punk.

I'm sorry but no rookie QB or not gets to act entitled towards Vets especially a Hall of Famer.

Whatever your fascination is with Steve, your conclusions are just wrong. Steve was an asshole, straight up. He was a toxic person. Hell, Steve even kept bitching at Delhomme.  After all the stories that came out about him when he left and others personal encounters with him and even a few that had inside knowledge, the evidence is against him. He stunted the growth of others around him. Ever wonder why we developed no other WRs during his tenure here or another QB even? He most certainly had a part in it. Cam had already been around Steve, he was the #1 pick and the franchise QB. You better believe that irked Steve as it took the spotlight off of him. If Cam didn't want to listen to Steve, he had good reason to.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Man, the Cam Stan's are Stanning hard I tell ya what. If Cam doesn't light it up, this place could be on suicide watch.

 

On second thought, this place will be in "Build an Excuse Land". lol

You show your true colors posting this after disappearing for days following Sam's meltdown against the Patriots.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

You show your true colors posting this after disappearing for days following Sam's meltdown against the Patriots.

 

18 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Uh oh... Mr. Positivity himself comes along and tells on himself.  Nah man, we ain't coming over to your house.

 

And look who gets triggered. The usual suspects. lol

Edited by iamhubby1
  • Poo 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, iamhubby1 said:

Man, the Cam Stan's are Stanning hard I tell ya what. If Cam doesn't light it up, this place could be on suicide watch.

 

On second thought, this place will be in "Build an Excuse Land". lol

Who cares? I would rather watch our own talent anytime than to watch someone else's first round failures fail on our team. fug Teddy and Sam and whoever else they thought could replace Cam because the reality is we were just as competitive with hurt Cam as we were with either of those 2 guys. 

You have made excuses for everyone on this team but now that Cam comes back you post this crap. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Likely confirms the intention was always to ultimately retire Cam's number IMO.


This is interesting considering Tepper told Steve Smith to his face on air that he doesn’t retire numbers.

Tepper making an exception for Cam and #1 is a big deal. 
 

Honestly though. #1 should be retired with Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

I don't think it means he was going to retire the number just to say to hold off on using it. Regardless, the point is Tepper never had some dislike of Cam and wasn't removing him from banners. That's just stupid Twitter poo that too many people fell for.


Most of this anti Tepper stuff has been baseless and the result of the teams win-loss record and how people feel about billionaires.

People just like making up stories to justify how they feel.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...