Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Happy Panther's tank thread and projected draft pick


Happy Panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, Smithers said:

At this point we need to lose out to ensure a top 5 pick.  That enables us to trade back and pick up a 2nd and 3rd rounder.  We need all the help we can get filling out the OL, QB, and MLB

If we get a top 5 pick I don’t think we will trade it. If we draft in the top 15 then I could see the argument. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

It was a tongue in cheek reference, and I just wanted to quote Bull Durham.

That being said, they are all possible wins. But I think we only win 1 more at most.  

Ah, loved the movie and totally missed the allusion.   however, if Tampa has their seed decided before the last game, we may see the scrubs.  It is the Panther way, to win the meaningless games.

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

The East is better than the south currently….

Nfc east total record is 20-24, nfc south is 23-22, by all metrics the nfc south is a worse division, and keep in mind 4 of those 20 wins came against us, just take our shitty games out of the equation the nfc east is 16-24 and the nfc south would be 23-18.  We suck so bad that we're the reason the nfc east doesn't look like the worst division in football.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe win 1 more game.   Put the team at #7 or #8.  

If there's a LT there, take him.  Otherwise trade back and try to get a late first round pick as well as something in rounds 2 or 3.  

Even a late first round pick can get a team the best interior OL in the draft.  So the top C or G, which would be a nice building block.  

Edited by BlitzMonster
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...