Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Falcons at Panthers Gameday Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Proudiddy said:

See, IDC what anyone says...  Cam is still a starter in this league, and a good one.  It's the fuging coaching, man.  When they get out of the fuging way, we can cook.  When they try to dictate what he and the other QBs do before the ball is even snapped, the whole offense goes to poo and we've seen it time and time again.

 

The thing with Cam is the offense can't struggle. He's a good passer...but not great. He's the best run threat in the league. There is no other player like Cam. There are faster QBs, more slippery QBs, but not any with his ability, size and ability to still be an adequate passer.

If he's not running, he's less dangerous and the offense is less potent.

Cam isn't a guy we can rely on because he will be hurt eventually. We know this. But for the immediate future (this season and I believe next season, minimum), he's our guy and should be our guy. Eventually we need a better QB, but we're not finding better anytime soon. Best option.

  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

See, IDC what anyone says...  Cam is still a starter in this league, and a good one.  It's the fuging coaching, man.  When they get out of the fuging way, we can cook.  When they try to dictate what he and the other QBs do before the ball is even snapped, the whole offense goes to poo and we've seen it time and time again.

whatever our offensive scheme is, it is horribly predictable.  Cam's innate abilities make an offense unpredictable and cover some of the TERRIBLE flaws in whatever poo we are trying to run.

I just wish we could see Cam with these weapons and a decent offensive coaching staff.  It is so fuging frustrating seeing us unable to scheme anything consistent.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPantherKing said:

What play calling? Call play... Ride Cam. Call play... Ride Cam. Call play... fake riding cam and hand off.

I think a Pop warner coach could call that offensive game plan

And yet the previous guy didn't get the memo, and this entire staff f'd up by getting rid of Cam last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...