Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hasson Reddick… what are you going to offer him?


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Pay the man. He is produces and is a great piece to build around.

There are guys under contract we can ditch to create cap space. Erving, Elf, Darnold and Anderson would be easy targets. We have 2 June 1st designations we can use and creative cap contracts.

Keep Reddick...if he wants to come back here at all thst is.

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You assume he wants to stay here. Maybe doesn't want to stick it out with this sh%t show. If he is looking to play on a contender now and not fug around with this mess anymore....this probably isn't the best choice.

 

Edited by Jmac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

I'd still let him go since I wouldn't pay big money to a smaller guy that can just rush the passer.

Agree, 10.5 sacks but can't stop the run. No thanks. We need to get back to ygm sized guys.  Reddick is too small to stop the run and not fast enough to be a coverage lb. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, toldozer said:

Agree, 10.5 sacks but can't stop the run. No thanks. We need to get back to ygm sized guys.  Reddick is too small to stop the run and not fast enough to be a coverage lb. 

If this is the new argument then we need to just switch gears and put all our resources in the offense bc even with a whole draft and back to back first round picks the defense is still a mess. Also kick the tires on potential trades no one should be off limits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...