Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Matt Rhule the most hated person in Panthers history?


ENCPantherfan2
 Share

Recommended Posts

Carruth anyone? He deserves every ounce of hate he gets because what he did was as absolutely evil. When it comes to football decisions I don’t hate anyone, as a person, but I do hate them when it comes to them being part of the organization. Hurney could have been a great person but glad he’s gone. Will be the same for Rhule.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I don’t hate him. I wish him the best once he is out of here. 

But as a professional NFL coach he is awful. It’s without question that he has assembled the worst coaching staff in the team’s history. it’s nothing personal with him but he needs to be let go as soon as the season ends.

This pretty much covers it.

Matt Rhule is only guilty of being inept at his job.  No need to hate the guy.

Unfortunately, Matt's job has a massive impact on the Panthers organization.  He is the living embodiment of the Peter Principle, promoted above his level of competence.

The fact that Matt continues to be employed by the Panthers despite his incompetence isn't his fault.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Scott12345 said:

You guys all hated JR 

and now you all hate Tepper

Considering that the on-field product under Tepper has yet to approach mediocrity, it's perhaps fair in that context.

10 minutes ago, mwright350 said:

Yeah any answer other than Carruth is objectively wrong.

That's a given, and I always assume that other answers are just from the lesser 'not Rae Carruth' pool.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Matt Rhule is not the most disliked person in the Panthers history, he is ranking right up near the top and getting closer to being #1 with each loss and bonehead decision he makes.

The Panthers are staring down the barrel of yet another losing season and nothing seems to be changing. If Rhule is having doubts about his own job security, there will never be a better time to walk away and save face than seasons end, providing there is interest.

There aren’t many college coaches throughout history that made a successful transition to the next level when given the opportunity. Coaching methods with kids learning their craft is one thing, but that doesn’t fly with established veterans who’ve seen it all before.

All of us loyal fans are growing increasingly frustrated with the product and the direction this team is heading. Judging by their current faith in Rhule, there wouldn’t be many tears shed if his leaving by choice or firing eventuality came to fruition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...