Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rapoport says Rhule will be retained “barring some unforeseen circumstance”


Dorian Gray
 Share

Recommended Posts

Rhule is screwed. They don’t have enough capital to fix all the holes. Either the QB situation is still goin to be a dumpster fire or they won’t get the OL that they need. Can’t fix both with 1 pick. The Wilson, Watson, Rogers Hail Mary is a nice thought but they aren’t agreeing to a trade to play for Rhule with the media reports. He’s done. 
 

Tepper needs to cut bait and hire McDaniels, Hackett, or Bienemy to see if they can save Darnold. When they can’t…they can move on with a fresh start and only 2022 will be wasted. Let Fitt continue to build the roster and when we’re ready to go we’ll be in position to draft the right QB with a solid supporting cast. 

Edited by unicar15
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

When Rhule struggles to get any decent OC candidate to so much as pick up the phone, maybe that'll be Tepper's wake up call? Yeah, I'm reaching.

Pretty sure he'll just keep Jeff Nixon.

He can backfill the RB coach spot with one of his former Baylor guys who got let go from LSU (DJ Mangas).

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I saw an interesting point the other day about our type of situation.  It could have been wise to hold him off for 1-2 weeks, but that would not have anything to do with Bryce and you could easily communicate that from a PR standpoint.   Why? Well, we just brought an entirely new staff into town, new offense for the returning OL, and had wholesale turnover elsewhere.  So just run Dalton out there the first game or so to see how things are shaking out.  Dry run to make sure we won't kill the kid.  We weren't eyeing the SB.  Get a sense of the line, the receivers, the playbook.  It gives you a glimpse of what Bryce would be stepping into and a good barometer on where things stood sans him.  I suppose we sort of did that with Dalton, but that was a reactive switch and like @Ricky Spanish mentioned, it was against an injured SEA defense where we threw a ridiculous amount.  Who knows, maybe we could have at least won a game or two more that way.  You can adjustments prior to Bryce stepping in, better tee it up for him, and maybe we end up winning game 1 or 2. Last year was such a sh*tshow.  One of the worst seasons I've ever experienced in any sport for any team.  Absolutely nothing made sense together.  Happy we cut the cord early, but should have never hired that crew in the first place.   
    • Johnson is gonna want $20M+ next year. That's why they should have drafted Ladd.
    • It's like folk didn't even watch the game. Dalton took a beating, and barely avoided a lot more violent hits. No 35 years old QB is going to survive a season like that. Imagine him against Dallas or Houston or Indy or Detroit or New Orleans twice! He played better than Bryce in that 1 game, but he wouldn't have lasted half the season. 
×
×
  • Create New...