Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are you going to do if Rhule turns it around next year?


Fan01
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Was viewing the game yesterday with Lady Cowboy Fan when we heard Matt Millen and his broadcast partner talk about believing in Rhule and saying that he deserved another year.

She laughed and asked what games these guys were watching.

Getting a vote of confidence from Matt Millen is a sure sign of failure. That guy was horrible in Detroit for years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Fan01 said:

We keep Rhule and fix the oline.  Darnold turns out to be pretty good with protection.  Defense gets time to rest and plays elite.  We go the playoff and look like legit contenders. 

Will your opinion of Rhule change?

Protection is talked about far too much by the Darnold apologists.  Let me lay some stats on ya.

Here are the current sacks surrendered numbers for the league:

image.png.16ca42a45062c519bb8f7c9a14a09cfc.png

Yep, there we are 4th from bottom.  Our line is terrible.  However, Cincy is WORSE.  And yet . . .

image.thumb.png.ee3e7303633cb847d7395e4689986444.png

There's Joe Burrow, top five in passing yards and completion percentage.  #6 in TD's.  Oh, his team is 10-6 and have their division wrapped up.

Ryan Tannehill with Tennessee is struggling this year, not a great line.  Lots of sacks.  Yet that team is 11-5, in the playoffs, and scoring 24 per game.

I definitely agree, it's much easier when you have a good line.  By the same token, a good QB and scheme can do things even with a bad line.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrianS said:

I definitely agree, it's much easier when you have a good line.  By the same token, a good QB and scheme can do things even with a bad line.

I'm sure Ron Rivera would find that information very useful.

Me? Not really up for hoping that we can be some kind of odd exception to the rule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Fan01 said:

We keep Rhule and fix the oline.  Darnold turns out to be pretty good with protection.  Defense gets time to rest and plays elite.  We go the playoff and look like legit contenders. 

Will your opinion of Rhule change?

Not a chance. Rhule isn't capable of turning it around I do not believe. I do however believe that Rhule gets close to a .599 winning percentage with luck and Tepper decided to keep him another year more and then we go something like 3-14 in 2023 finally firing this guy but by that time the franchise could be in such bad shape that it will take 5 years to even sniff playoffs with an actual good legitimate NFL head coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we can discuss this more logically in the offseason as there is almost no room here to give Rhule and Tepper some benefit without being strung up.

For me Rhule was always on a three year program. It takes an amount of time to instill a brand and a philosophy. And while we are all frustrated I am perfectly happy to see if Matt can turn it around. And Tepper who I am sure hates this more than anyone.

I imagine Rhule will be on the top of the hotseat list next year and a candidate to be the first coach fired next year if we aren't on track to make the playoffs.

So I am not freaking out. yet.

And Tepper is not trying to leave Charlotte. Just stfu if you think this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basically agree.  He is the one of that bunch that offers upgraded pass catching along with he is supposed to be kind of special.   Then you have the OL and the ideas that if they perform you can have JAG backs and still do well. So okay we could be fine.  But Brooks is important and to me that receiving element sets him apart.  So there sure is something riding on him.     What strikes me as incongruent is people over in Atlanta or those that follow them look at Penix with a third surgery and act like it is no big deal.      And we are on pins and needles over Brooks.  Either they should worry a lot more or we should worry a lot less.  
    • I usually go a game or two optimist over the consensus here but this is too early for me to say. I need to see some players on the field.  I am not feeling real optimistic though.  
    • Okay as a ‘take CJ’ fan I actually don’t obsess over CJ and Houston, contrary to the narrative.  But I thought I picked up some noise that his OL left a lot to be desired.    Not a single Beyce supporter would judge him harshly if he had a crappy OL. We all know that.    So be fair about it.  A QB needs to be protected.  Especially a guy that gets to his spot and wants to finish the play from there. Which CJ is.  
×
×
  • Create New...