Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How close are you to checking out?


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

this offense sucks balls, but it’s putting up more points that 5 Fox offenses. the last year of foxball, we averaged just 12ppg. as sad as this offense is, it’s not even close to what that fool put on the field.

That was a totally different era of football

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meh…panthers have always sucked this isn’t new to me lol

im sure the cam bandwagoners are in shock and disgusted…probably should’ve researched this team a lil more before following 

Now a few more years of this? Yea then we are on a new level. At that point I’ll just watch the highlights

and going to a game? Lol that’s not new either, hasn’t been worth it for over half a decade and over half a decade before 2013 and again before 2003

it has never been worth it for multiple years in franchise history, ala no b2b winning seasons

this feels pretty normal to me tbh barring it not continuing for 3+ more years

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll watch the Panthers as much as Redzone shows, much like I do now if the Panthers retain Rhule. I won't give up on the team for that.

Trading for Watson on the other hand would in fact end my fandom in the Panthers. I can't root for a team that gives the keys to the franchise to an "alleged" sexual predator. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Kraybrothers said:

https://youtu.be/iWn4YZ-KSKo

tepper said it was not a 2 year fix… it takes time

https://youtu.be/ku5srUwBgko

does this sound familiar to you?

Sure does. Sounds a lot like when people were defending Michael Vick because "it really takes this many years to learn the West Coast Offense."

Right now, Rhule just needs a third year. And when that fails, he'll just need a fourth year. And so on, and so on, and...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s hard for me to say because anything can happen. I’m sure I’ll be in tune somewhat but I won’t make my yearly trek to Charlotte for a game. The front license plate will stay on the truck. But I won’t go out of my way to make sure I’m watching the games next year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...