Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ben McaDoo to interview for OC job


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is a typical move I expected. It's like Rivera after hiring CHUD. He went to a guy he knew couldn't take his place. It wasn't till years later he hired Norv and we had a decent concept and scheme. Rhule is going to be Rivera with a lot less winning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

How exactly does another year of Rhule doing more damage make that situation better?

That’s the point. Leash/damage control Rhule and send him out as a lame duck.

How is hiring some equally under-qualified (because that’s all Carolina has access to with what they’re selling) lame duck coach, whose system won’t be implanted all the same better or any different than that? It isn’t, it’s just the same.

Fans want an emotional ‘message to be sent’ firing but it literally means nothing and won’t do anything.

Fact is in what Carolina has to offer you cannot make this situation better. All you can do is take measures not to get worse.

Sorry I don’t see a difference unless 1. There is no damage control or 2. A talented prospect says fug better opportunities I’m going to Carolina.

Quite frankly, I see neither happening. I’ll be pretty shocked if Rhule os allowed to play with next years’ draft picks tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

What players are you worried about?  This is a roster on the whole devoid of talent

Chinn, Burns, Moore, Brian, CMC, Horn, Moton, Shaq, Brown. There isn’t a shortage of talent on this roster, the huge issue is Rhule trading away assets on a busted QB and ignoring key OL positions. You don’t keep a coach on the hot seat for a year while you are wanting to tank. What’s to stop Rhule from drafting Pickett, trading away a future 1st to draft another player of his choosing and signing Reddick to a bloated contract. Our situation got worse from Rhule’s first to second year and it very well could even get worse after his 3rd. Tepper guaranteed Rhule 3 years like a fool and he is going to give it to him.. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, onmyown said:

That’s the point. Leash/damage control Rhule and send him out as a lame duck.

How is hiring some equally under-qualified (because that’s all Carolina has access to with what they’re selling) lame duck coach, whose system won’t be implanted all the same better or any different than that? It isn’t, it’s just the same.

Fans want an emotional ‘message to be sent’ firing but it literally means nothing and won’t do anything.

Fact is in what Carolina has to offer you cannot make this situation better. All you can do is take measures not to get worse.

Sorry I don’t see a difference unless 1. There is no damage control or 2. A talented prospect says fug better opportunities I’m going to Carolina.

Quite frankly, I see neither happening. I’ll be pretty shocked if Rhule os allowed to play with next years’ draft picks tbh.

There's no indication that Rhule is on any sort of "leash" or that he will be. And again, if you have to take those kinds of measures, just fire him.

Any notion that we become a more attractive destination after another year of Rhule, lame duck or not, is just silly.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...