Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

McAdoo's x-ray vision for QBs


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

For who? We benched Sam and the offense looked much worse overall.

No bro. We benched Sam and the offense came to life. Albeit minimal life but better. 

Hell, even Robbie could catch again. 

Dude was on a 20 quarters without a TD streak..that's wild. Amazingly we still beat Atlanta during that span. He did manage to throw 2 his last game though. 

Even if we build the line, they're going to blitz him the entire game. 

Funny thing is, I legitimately thought we fleeced the Jets at one point. I have zero faith in Sam. And when the hits started most of his interceptions were threw when he had time. BUT hey that's our QB. They still believe they can fix him based off his first 3 games. We'll see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

For who? We benched Sam and the offense looked much worse overall.

 

The Panthers problem isn't quarterback. Darnold could be a Pro Bowl player with an adequate offensive line. Sam Darnold, Brady, Rodgers, doesn't matter. The Panthers would've been relative garbage with anyone. Add in the fact that McCaffrey was hurt and a dude was calling plays who would be hard pressed to be a Division 2 offensive coordinator.

No.  Darnold is not a Pro Bowl player, regardless of line.  No one has been able to teach Darnold to make decisions more quickly, which is his problem.  The three R's.  Read, Recognize, React.  He's a second slow on that and in the NFL, that's the difference between a Pro Bowl QB and backup.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BrianS said:

No.  Darnold is not a Pro Bowl player, regardless of line.  No one has been able to teach Darnold to make decisions more quickly, which is his problem.  The three R's.  Read, Recognize, React.  He's a second slow on that and in the NFL, that's the difference between a Pro Bowl QB and backup.

 

that was the same guy who said it was most efficient to take a QB after the 1st round in another thread, I’d disregard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BrianS said:

No.  Darnold is not a Pro Bowl player, regardless of line.  No one has been able to teach Darnold to make decisions more quickly, which is his problem.  The three R's.  Read, Recognize, React.  He's a second slow on that and in the NFL, that's the difference between a Pro Bowl QB and backup.

 

At the NFL level it all happens so quickly. The read is presnap. Once the ball is snapped, you basically have a split second to recognize what the D is doing. Everything that happens after that is pure reaction. If you're still thinking it's going to happen too slow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

At the NFL level it all happens so quickly. The read is presnap. Once the ball is snapped, you basically have a split second to recognize what the D is doing. Everything that happens after that is pure reaction. If you're still thinking it's going to happen too slow.

Yes!  Is the Oline a problem? Sure it is, but QB is a bigger problem. If anybody needs proof just look at the Bengals. Their line is just as bad, but the difference is they have Burrow. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if McAdoo had been the OC or QB coach last year if he would have been able to convince the decision makers not to trade for Sam and/or the 5th year option.
 

If the Panthers had just rolled with Teddy, this team would be in a much better position right now with both space cap and draft picks (#38 pick for Sam is gone). 

Edited by thennek
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BrianS said:

No.  Darnold is not a Pro Bowl player, regardless of line.  No one has been able to teach Darnold to make decisions more quickly, which is his problem.  The three R's.  Read, Recognize, React.  He's a second slow on that and in the NFL, that's the difference between a Pro Bowl QB and backup.

 

Rhule has been terrible at developing any player, not just Darnold. Most players on this team regressed. I think there may have been a window to fix Darnold with competent coaching, but that window is likely closed. Gase was terrible. Rhule has been worse. McAdoo, who knows what he can do, but I hold no illusions he will be able to correct Darnolds flaws. At this point, he's an 18m paperweight. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Rhule has been terrible at developing any player, not just Darnold. Most players on this team regressed. I think there may have been a window to fix Darnold with competent coaching, but that window is likely closed. Gase was terrible. Rhule has been worse. McAdoo, who knows what he can do, but I hold no illusions he will be able to correct Darnolds flaws. At this point, he's an 18m paperweight. 

Truth. Shaq is probably the only guy on the roster who I might honestly argue has improved under Rhule. Everyone else seems to be about the same or worse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...