Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor. Jimmy G potentially to Saints. Steelers also making a push


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, hepcat said:

Jimmy G might actually be decent in New Orleans I mean they managed to win some games with Trevor Semen 

Remember when Siemian was Broncos Starting Qb after Peyton Manning left and they acted like he was going to be great? I mean he was an okay QB but not great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, stbugs said:

It’s also the prospects. This class pales in comparison to last year’s class. SF had no issue trading 3 firsts to get the 3rd QB and Chicago traded a 1st to move up for QB4. Anyone going to give up a pick to move up and get QB1 this year?

We as we’ve done since Hurney 2.0 came back, misjudge the strengths and weaknesses of upcoming drafts. Last year was a much better year to take a QB and we messed up in several ways (not tanking and trading for Darnold) and now it looks like we’ll ignore a great tackle class again and reach for a QB that probably goes 2nd round last year and may not even be as good as Mills a 3rd rounder last year.

Yeah, Justin Fields or Mac Jones would probably be a slam dunk #1 pick this year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

Its not a matter of the prospects available in the draft, its what it costs to move up to grab a QB prospect

Dude, I thank the football gods weekly that you take the time to post here. Now I thank you for making sense and trying to patiently, put things into a reasonable perspective and take down the hyperbole that is unfortunately so common place. You're my fav poster hands down. Keep Pounding Casillas!!! 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, stbugs said:

SF had no issue trading 3 firsts to get the 3rd QB and Chicago traded a 1st to move up for QB4. Anyone going to give up a pick to move up and get QB1 this year?

True but how did that work out for them? It's early it's true but the first couldn't beat out an injured Garrapolo and the second was worse than Dalton. Maybe they will be great but so far they haven't exactly proven the "experts" to be so great at judging QBs but better suited at hyping stories and players for clicks. I don't really see it as proof that no QB in this class will be good or not. The QB who had the best season was supposed to be the one who wasn't really an NFL caliber QB to many. Heck, the Texans drafted the QB with the second best season from last year's class in the 3rd round I believe.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, joemac said:

We’re gonna end up with Jameis Winston at this point. Not that that is necessarily a terrible thing, but….damn. 

Gardner Minshew would be better. We should just trade Robbie’s ass straight up for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don’t see it happening, especially not for the ridiculous price they will likely want for his services. Not that I want it to anyway, with all the weapons he has there and he still couldn’t pull it off. 

I’d rather continue rolling with Winston who was on pace for a 34-7 TD-INT ratio before going down, and that was with a makeshift WR room consisting mostly of undrafted free agents. At least this year he should have Thomas to throw to for a few games. 😂

 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's just a talking head.  Talking about gambling. If anybody takes the under on 4.5 wins, they're most likely losing their money.   So he's only saying if you want to bet on a possible sleeper, take the over.  It's not rocket science.  Pathetic that so many on the huddle have reduced themselves to posting purely trash every time they hit the submit button.
    • I mean I think the best case scenario has to hit for the Panthers and everyone else in the NFCS has to hit their worst case scenario.  Personally, I think this is the year that NO finally collapses and I think they finish 4th in the division regardless.  ATL is overrated but still likely a 6-9 win team. TB plays tough football, their defense will be there but their success depends on the offense, they too are a 6-9 win team.  The Panthers are probably 4-6 wins at best. If they find some sort of momentum during the season and get 7-8 wins, and TB and ATL struggle then maybe but I find it very unlikely. 
    • We screwed up a couple years ago taking Bryce in the first place.  Nobody held a gun to our head to jump from #9 to #1.  Most people who keep up with draft news knew this 2024 QB class was loaded and we should have waited, which I advocated. It was a dumb move and I knew it.  Now we have to roll with Bryce another year.  That's fine, because this 2025 class isn't that great.  I like Ewers, but not super high on him.  If Bryce shows improvement, which I think he will, that should get him at least one more season before we have to decide on if he's the permanent answer or not.  I've said before, the 2026 draft is the next window for a franchise QB if Bryce isn't the answer. Bryce gets this year and next at a minimum.
×
×
  • Create New...