Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Florio: Panthers understand they have to give up 3 firsts, another pick, and 1-2 (Chinn, Burns, Brown, Horn)


Kraybrothers
 Share

Recommended Posts

You really have to check out what we’re left with after something like this. 

We absolutely cannot make more of these Darnold/Hendo trades with our 2nds and 3rds if this goes down and I’d imagine we could add a Texans mid round pick to next year as well in return.

I also think 3 first and 2 players is too damn high. 2 firsts+2 players sure, 3 firsts+1 player okay but stretching things thin moving forward. And if 3 firsts, one of those is conditional at the minimum as with the Wentz trade.

When the players discussed are proven 1st rounders on their rookie deals, that’s honestly better value than a first. Burns & Brown would be my choices and they’d have to take on Darnold if they are getting that high of value from us. 

We’re also getting depleted draft wise if we make an offer that outbids other teams. We’d basically be skipping this draft. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, I'd rather draft a rookie, and keep the assets. For his situation, the price is too high. 

We're not a QB away, and trading any of our young defensive pieces while paying premium for a QB and no draft picks for a guy who ain't played in a year....

Miss me with that shiiiiii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the draft picks are one thing. If you give up the pick and all those players, it'll take several years to actually build a team around Watson. And he'll likely be up for a new contract around the same time. Like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Again. In what world is Watson worth more than Wilson!?

Edited by La Pantera
  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...