Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Watson Watch Day 4 - The Finale


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, RJK said:

Then that would be really stupid of DW to accept because that's their only offensive weapon LOL. This is so annoying because carolina is obviously the best choice and watson is being a little bitch

Are we? DJ Moore and an oft injured CMC. That's all we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Smithers said:

Allen Robinson got tired of waiting around for this so called super team of Atlanta to form - signed a 3 year contract with the Rams.  

Atlanta doesn't have any cap space. They absolutely have to trade Matt Ryan. It's so funny that pencil neck is mucking up their attempts to trade for Watson. He has a no-trade clause too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

I don't understand why he wouldn't be??

Idk why one wouldn't assume that since the Texans want players with pro bowl potential on rookie deals but tons are thinking they'll keep him because Watson will force himself to the Falcons. Which is silly to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, hepcat said:

Atlanta doesn't have any cap space. They absolutely have to trade Matt Ryan. It's so funny that pencil neck is mucking up their attempts to trade for Watson. He has a no-trade clause too. 

He doesn’t have a no trade clause. It’s a nobody wants him situation.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Are we? DJ Moore and an oft injured CMC. That's all we have.

DJ is a beast, and Robby will bounce back.  He closed strong.  Plus we drafted two promising WRs and also just picked up Higgins, who is solid.  Don't underestimate what Thomas and Tremble will bring in McAdoo's offense either.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, frankw said:

And then packed it in within a day when the Browns explored a trade for DW. Big no thanks to Baker I would rather draft one than settle for that.

Plus he sucked ass after that torn labrum and their OC blamed it on his mechanics being all off. It's none throwing shoulder but still, why toss away another draft pick for a possible one year rental that will win you 2 more games maybe

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

He has two years of 40 million each year left on his deal. I know next year is only like 15 million in dead cap if cut compared to 40 but who in the hell is taking that on without getting a first round pick in return. Colts can’t be that dumb. The falcons can’t add picks to the Ryan trade because then they lose ammo for a Watson trade. 

Unless the Colts go full retard I can’t see it happening.

I think Matt Ryan is severely underrated by people on this board. He would be an upgrade over Wentz for them next season. They have a roster put together, they just need a QB who won't screw things up. It'd be the Philip Rivers experiment 2.0 for them.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...