Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unverified and unsubstantiated....Panthers Closing in on Trade for Love

Biggdaddi1022

By Biggdaddi1022,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Biggdaddi1022 Explorer

Biggdaddi1022

Posted
Posted

Panthers are discussing a trade with the Packers for Jordan Love. Panthers are offering a 4th this year and 3rd next year. Packers want a 2nd next year only… what do y’all think? 

Jordan love has quietly requested a trade because he knows he will not get a chance to start to in GB after Rodgers extension. 

I know y’all want sources but at this I can’t say because of how they got the info.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRumGone Grand Master

TheRumGone

Posted
Posted (edited)

I’d actually be ok with a move like this. I’d like to see them get that 3rd down to another 4th in this scenario but he’s got a cannon arm. I know the general consensus is he’s kind of a bust but these are the types of low cost moves for a franchise desperately needing to find a franchise qb. Maybe he figures it out with more playing time. Learning behind Rodgers doesn’t hurt. It was always the pick compensation for Darnold. Giving up a second for someone you know for a fact fuging sucks is bad.

Edited by TheRumGone
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

It is best not to try to break "insider information" unless you have some tweet or other form of confirmation to share with it.  There are too many trolls out there with this kind of crap-so where exactly did you come across this information? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
uncfan888 Grand Master

uncfan888

Posted
Posted
Just now, Lets go get it Canes said:

If it’s true I hate it. Love was Terrible when he had to play. I don’t get why the panthers just don’t draft one vs getting another teams reject again and again. 

Cuz there are no good ones in this year's draft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • Dave Gettleman's Shorts
      TIME TO SPECULATE

      By Dave Gettleman's Shorts · Posted

      adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...