Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unverified and unsubstantiated....Panthers Closing in on Trade for Love


Biggdaddi1022
 Share

Recommended Posts

Panthers are discussing a trade with the Packers for Jordan Love. Panthers are offering a 4th this year and 3rd next year. Packers want a 2nd next year only… what do y’all think? 

Jordan love has quietly requested a trade because he knows he will not get a chance to start to in GB after Rodgers extension. 

I know y’all want sources but at this I can’t say because of how they got the info.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’d actually be ok with a move like this. I’d like to see them get that 3rd down to another 4th in this scenario but he’s got a cannon arm. I know the general consensus is he’s kind of a bust but these are the types of low cost moves for a franchise desperately needing to find a franchise qb. Maybe he figures it out with more playing time. Learning behind Rodgers doesn’t hurt. It was always the pick compensation for Darnold. Giving up a second for someone you know for a fact fuging sucks is bad.

Edited by TheRumGone
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is best not to try to break "insider information" unless you have some tweet or other form of confirmation to share with it.  There are too many trolls out there with this kind of crap-so where exactly did you come across this information? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Lets go get it Canes said:

If it’s true I hate it. Love was Terrible when he had to play. I don’t get why the panthers just don’t draft one vs getting another teams reject again and again. 

Cuz there are no good ones in this year's draft 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...