Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Unverified and unsubstantiated....Panthers Closing in on Trade for Love

Biggdaddi1022

By Biggdaddi1022,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Growl Grand Master

Growl

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, BrianS said:

 

No, in fact, this is the opposite of what people said last offseason.  Last offseason we were saying there hasn't been such a promising group of QB's in a long, long time.

lol no, they weren’t.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ATLpanther Enthusiast

ATLpanther

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CmC2k said:

Love is better than both Willis and Pickett and if we can get him for something cheap like a next year 3rd and our extra 5th this year, I'd absolutely do it. If it doesn't work out, you're only really out a 3rd and you can just move on and draft a QB next year in a better class and with hopefully better coaching staff. 

There’s a reason that the Packers resigned Rodgers for record money. Love is a bust. I rather roll with Darnold behind a revamped OL than give even a late round pick for Love. I’m done with the knee jerk bandaid projects

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TLGPanthersFan Grand Master

TLGPanthersFan

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

 

I feel like if we get Jimmy G we are right back to where we were 2 years ago with Bridgewater. 
Can the front office not see that? Yes he was in the Super Bowl and almost a second last year. 
But context matters, they weren’t in either situation because of Jimmy G and they lost both because of him. 
Front Offices needs to take of their blinders and realize that maybe the success of a team is because of the team and not because of the person under center. That is how we got Bridgewater. Because the office thought it was because of him the Saints went 5-0 with him and not because the defense played their best games during that 5 game stretch. Other than the Bucs game Bridgewaters stats were pretty meh. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
KillerKat Grand Master

KillerKat

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

I feel like if we get Jimmy G we are right back to where we were 2 years ago with Bridgewater. 
Can the front office not see that? Yes he was in the Super Bowl and almost a second last year. 
But context matters, they weren’t in either situation because of Jimmy G and they lost both because of him. 
Front Offices needs to take of their blinders and realize that maybe the success of a team is because of the team and not because of the person under center. That is how we got Bridgewater. Because the office thought it was because of him the Saints went 5-0 with him and not because the defense played their best games during that 5 game stretch. Other than the Bucs game Bridgewaters stats were pretty meh. 

Bridgewater still hasn't been the starting QB of a team that has gone to a SB and another Conference Championship. Whatever you say negates your whole argument. Crappy QBs don't do that. The shitting on Jimmy G on this board is unwarranted. Yeah you can be warry of him because of his shoulder surgery, but I keep seeing comparisons to Bridgewater, Darnold, and w/e crappy QB you can come up with and it is complete bullshit.

Myself, I am warry because of his recent surgery and would rather go after Baker instead. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, ATLpanther said:

There’s a reason that the Packers resigned Rodgers for record money. Love is a bust. I rather roll with Darnold behind a revamped OL than give even a late round pick for Love. I’m done with the knee jerk bandaid projects

Keep in mind Love has had elite coaching as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • TD alt
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By TD alt · Posted

      I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • kungfoodude
      You know what's worse about the QB situation?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...