Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mel Kiper's 3.0 Mock Draft


Jesse
 Share

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I won’t go as far as to call Kiper a clown, but that has certainly entered my mind about him before. He said Jim Drunkenmiller was the best QB of his class, that Steve Emtman was a can’t miss and that Tony Mandarich was the best OL ever.

He’s most famous for being absolutely right that Trev Alberts would be an absolute bust, but he wanted Trent Dilfer taken in that spot. He writes a million mock drafts per year and constantly contradicts himself, regardless of the teams’ needs.

The fact that ESPN has been paying him (and paying him well) for over 30 years is just short of astounding.

He just loved Clausen too

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

He just loved Clausen too

Exactly. It’s been awhile since Mel’s official announcement way back in 2010. If your memory needs to be jogged a bit, he did it while debating ESPN foil Todd McShay on “NFL Live” leading up to that year’s draft.

The topic? The NFL future of then-Notre Dame quarterback Jimmy Clausen.

Kiper had Clausen ranked as the fourth best prospect in the entire 2010 NFL Draft even though most other draft pundits had the QB projected to go in the second round (Clausen was subsequently selected 48th overall by the Carolina Panthers). At the time, people accused Kiper of being biased since he and Clausen shared the same agent, Gary Wichard.

But Kiper only dug in his heels further, making this infamous proclamation on ESPN:

“If Jimmy Clausen is not a successful quarterback in the NFL, I’m done. That’s it. I’m out.”

Replied McShay: “What is your time frame, Mel? When do we make that assessment?”

Kiper: “I want eight years.”

McShay: “It will only take three years, Mel. We can tell inside three years.”

Kiper: “I want eight.”

Well, Kiper got his eight years and here we finally are in 2022 — over 10 years after Clausen’s final NFL game. As for whether his career was a “success,” the stats speak for themselves:

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Mel Kipper doesn't know poo. Panthers could take a DE but it won't be because Mel knows it.

If they sign a QB and a LT, or if 4 Tackles go before they pick at #6--then they MIGHT take a DE.  Kiper is a fraud and has been for years.  He is always totally wrong but they bring him back. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, KatsAzz said:

The fact that ESPN has been paying him (and paying him well) for over 30 years is just short of astounding.

He's extremely controversial and when he opens his mouth people still listen, even in disbelief.  Sometimes guys like this make people tune in even if he is wrong.  I think bringing Todd McShay to counter him makes keeping him on the staff that much more interesting.  He smart and knows a lot about these players and makes some good points.   His Mocks are terrible an usually he only gets the first pick right.   

I wish I had his gig.  Work 30 years and be wrong most of the time and still get PAID. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

He's extremely controversial and when he opens his mouth people still listen, even in disbelief.  Sometimes guys like this make people tune in even if he is wrong.  I think bringing Todd McShay to counter him makes keeping him on the staff that much more interesting.  He smart and knows a lot about these players and makes some good points.   His Mocks are terrible an usually he only gets the first pick right.   

I wish I had his gig.  Work 30 years and be wrong most of the time and still get PAID. 

As in "Who in the hell is Mel Killer Jr"?

A load of people still remember that moment years later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

He's extremely controversial and when he opens his mouth people still listen, even in disbelief.  Sometimes guys like this make people tune in even if he is wrong.  I think bringing Todd McShay to counter him makes keeping him on the staff that much more interesting.  He smart and knows a lot about these players and makes some good points.   His Mocks are terrible an usually he only gets the first pick right.   

I wish I had his gig.  Work 30 years and be wrong most of the time and still get PAID. 

Kipper is wrong on every single pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How did this “innovative” narrative start with Canales? Just because he’s young? He truly wants to run the ball and nothing Tampa did last year was all that creative. Mike Evans ability to win 1 on 1 does wonders for an offense as a whole 
    • Initially, I wanted Stroud but I thought the trade up meant that, whoever they chose, it was for a reason.  There was no pressure to do anything for the entire scouting team to do other than investigate every aspect of the top 3 candidates.  Stroud had his question marks, and I think it is possible that he falters this year.  Bryce had a much worse situation here in Carolina because we neglected the OL, traded our #1 WR, did not pick WRs well in the draft, traded our pro bowl RB, and seem to disregard the TE position altogether.  Bozeman was not a good fit and we relied on an improved OL in 2022 to suggest that we were set there when we were far from it.  Fitterer had no vision, no grasp of talent, and everyone in the front office and on the coaching staff were pretending to be gurus.  Our coaching staff was a group of men earning a lifetime achievement paycheck.  It all goes back to the years of neglect for the OL.  My theory?  If Stroud had come to Carolina, he would be as mocked and ridiculed as Bryce Young.   No, he does not have a cannon.  Chad Pennington was a weak-armed QB who had success and would have been even better if it were not for injuries.  Smarts is important at QB, and so are mechanics.  Before you can address Young's mechanics, he needs an OL, Running game, and weapons. We were not really able to run play action from under center for a few reasons--play action is not effective when you have to pass the ball--other than that, the QB must turn his back to the LOS for about 1.5 seconds.  When the QB has less than 2.5 seconds to pass the ball, that eliminates that part of the play book.  Heck, even the run option is minimized when there is immediate facial pressure.  SO those who want to talk about happy feet, bouncing, etc--they are symptoms of the problem, not the problem.  A weak arm?  Well, Young's arm is between Chad Pennington and Joe Montana--closer to Joe.  His are is not as weak as some think--but he has issues with the deep ball. When you are reacting to the defense and quickly have to pass, then that takes away the strength because you don't have the base to get power behind it.  I still wish we had taken Stroud, but we have Young and if you toss him out before giving him support, you are not wise, unsmart, not unfoolish, and rather elite in your failure to attain mediocrity.  Expect growth.  How much? Nobody knows.
×
×
  • Create New...