Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis - "When it comes to big time issues, like quarterback, the owner is pretty involved."


trueblade
 Share

Recommended Posts

Let me do a little Twitter housekeeping here. 

Being “pretty involved” is vague, so let me translate: He’s the owner, and when it comes to cornerstone decisions, such as sizing up their next swing at a franchise quarterback, my understanding is he’ll be an active participant in that decision. Same as he was during the bulk of their pursuit of Watson.   

I don’t think this is an outrageous statement. Luckily, I’m in a nice position in my life, in which I don’t have to log onto the Internet and make things up.

So, that’s what I was getting at, and I hope that helps.

 

Edited by ellis
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to argue that the two most powerful people in that building, football/otherwise, are the owner, followed by the HC. It appears the general manager has less resistance and more cooperation this year. That’s not to imply there was ever a conflict, that’s just the nature of the business.  

I don’t think I’m alone in that assessment. 

I don’t think any of this is really groundbreaking, like I said.

Edited by ellis
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ellis said:

Hard to argue that the two most powerful people in that building, football/otherwise, are the owner, followed by the HC. It appears the general manager has less resistance and more cooperation this year. That’s not to imply there was ever a conflict, that’s just the nature of the business.  

I don’t think I’m alone in that assessment. 

I don’t think any of this is really groundbreaking, like I said.

I always appreciate your posts 

it is really difficult to believe that Tepper approved the Darnold trade.
 

If he did, zero respect for him. I know  I know. He doesn’t care about my respect or anyone else’s 

but, I guess that’s just as believable as hiring a mediocre Div 1 coach, paying him more than the very best pro coaches, and handing him the keys to a nfl franchise with Marty Hurney as the doorman

 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

Sam Darnold never showed he was special last year.   

he did have a bad staff around him.  But we have 4 years of Sam Darnold as starting QB in the NFL.  He isn't a starter.  He isn't being held back.  He simply is part of the offensive problem with the staff. 

I know, I'm just yanking your chain.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

How do we know Tepper likes Pickett the most aside from the Pitt connection? He liked Fields last year who is like the opposite of Pickett…

This is the right question. Do we have any actual intel that he prefer Pickett over Willis?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, MechaZain said:

I'd be concerned if he wasn't involved.

I'm more concerned if he is.

It's kind of like a guy who knows nothing about home building hiring experienced builders, then deciding  he doesn't like the way they're doing it so he's going to tell them how to do their job...or just do it himself.

The correct action would be to hire a different builder, of course. But when you're one of those people who always thinks you're the smartest person in the room (even when you're clearly the dumbest) this is how things often play out 

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm more concerned if he is.

It's kind of like a guy who knows nothing about home building hiring experienced builders, then deciding  he doesn't like the way they're doing it so he's going to tell them how to do their job...or just do it himself.

The correct action would be to hire a different builder, of course. But when you're one of those people who always thinks you're the smartest person in the room (even when you're clearly the dumbest) this is how things often play out 

Owners (or CEO's) are always involved in big decisions, even if it's out of their realm of expertise. You may have a CEO whose head of a dept store company, whose specialty is retail operations, but he will be involved in major real estate acquisitions as well, even though he really doesn't know much on the subject.

Here's another example. I'm going to upgrade my company's fleet of work trucks. Before I drop 300 grand on vehicles, I'm going to clear it with the owner, who has never changed the oil on his vehicle once in his life. And if he doesn't like Ford, we won't be buying F250's. Or maybe he feels we need F350's or maybe F150's, etc. At any rate, his opinion will be involved in the decision, and he'll have final decision. He may leave that decision broad for others to decide the fine details, but he'll have some sort of input into it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Luciu5 said:

Owners (or CEO's) are always involved in big decisions, even if it's out of their realm of expertise. You may have a CEO whose head of a dept store company, whose specialty is retail operations, but he will be involved in major real estate acquisitions as well, even though he really doesn't know much on the subject.

Here's another example. I'm going to upgrade my company's fleet of work trucks. Before I drop 300 grand on vehicles, I'm going to clear it with the owner, who has never changed the oil on his vehicle once in his life. And if he doesn't like Ford, we won't be buying F250's. Or maybe he feels we need F350's or maybe F150's, etc. At any rate, his opinion will be involved in the decision, and he'll have final decision. He may leave that decision broad for others to decide the fine details, but he'll have some sort of input into it.

I get that owners always want to be involved, but the smart ones who hire smart people listen to those people.

When it comes to football matters, I've not seen a single thing that made me think David Tepper is very smart.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That's fair, but I've also never said you can't enjoy a win, there is a big difference between enjoying a win and sticking your head in the sand about our issues, which is what so many who are "just enjoying the win because of how bad we've been lately" are doing. You can enjoy a win while also seeing the realities, and if you're a fan who can just enjoy those wins, more power to you.  But I'd prefer to see improvement over bad wins, and sure, I'd rather see wins and improvement in the same game, but if that's not an option, give me improvement in a loss over frustration in a win. I genuinely don't understand why that's a controversial take, as I'm literally rooting for the thing that will help us contend faster, even if that won't be very fast.
    • Yeah. Pretty obvious there. One thing I saw less of than normal (my perception) is the behind the LOS attempts. 
    • The irony here is interesting You say the change won't happen overnight, so you're good with enjoying the wins despite not showing actual improvement. You're right, it's not going to change overnight, which is why so many of us are rooting for seeing improvement right now over bad wins right now, because you have to start somewhere if you ever hope to improve. Winning ugly doesn't help us in the future, but showing improvement would
×
×
  • Create New...