Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rich Eisen on Pelissero's QB piece


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

No he couldn't. Did you watch the senior bowl? He ran away from those guys as well and they were NFL caliber with some first rounders. They even have their timed field speed and Willis was moving at least 2-4 miles per hour faster than the next fastest qb who was not Pickett.  Yall need to stop playing with Willis speed.

Screenshot_20220423-113258_Chrome.jpg

wtf is zebra technologies? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

nah thats bullshit

 

pickett could beat him in a straight line race and Willis was dodging scrubs that make him look more mobile than he is

Who cares about a straight line race?? How often is that going to happen for our QB. Willis is far more elusive and quick than Pickett, he showed it at the Senior Bowl against the same competition. He showed it against Syracuse and Va Tech (same schools Pickett played in the ACC). Willis is this year’s Trey Lance (small school QB with huge upside but needs the right staff and probably needs to sit a year). He isn’t the QB that our staff needs to draft, but he has some great upside. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

No he couldn't. Did you watch the senior bowl? He ran away from those guys as well and they were NFL caliber with some first rounders. They even have their timed field speed and Willis was moving at least 2-4 miles per hour faster than the next fastest qb who was not Pickett.  Yall need to stop playing with Willis speed.

Screenshot_20220423-113258_Chrome.jpg

Based on this Zappe will be the choice for our RPO offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I’m thinking the best we can do (without Rhule ruining next year’s assets for our new coach), is trade low picks for Baker and draft a LT at 6. Don’t let Rhule extend Baker until AFTER the season. If he earns a new contract then that opens things up. If he struggles we let him walk at no expense to us. We have a promising OL and defense for our new coach and our early picks for him to draft his QB. Rhule gets his vet, our OL coach gets a great group of guys to work with and fans don’t have to watch Darnold again. This is all assuming the Browns eat a chunk of his salary too. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always either "there's no QB worth drafting" or "all the QBs will be gone before we pick". According to the Huddle it's never the right time to draft a QB.

To be fair last year was the year we should have drafted a QB. We could be now talking how we are going to draft a LT to protect Fields or Jones. We wiffed hard on that one. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't want to gamble at #6.

I see both sides, I really do.  You don't want to waste a pick on a guy you think has zero chance of making it but at some point a QB is almost always a riskier choice that one or more non-QBs.

For those that don't want to gamble on a QB this year, did you feel the same about Cam?  

Also in the last 10 years how many QB would you have been ok gambling on?  Luck, Lawrance...

Even though we were not in position to pick one of them, they went before our pick.

In the last 10 years how many QBs that were available to pick at our spot were you willing to gamble on?

19 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always a gamble. Y'all acting like a LT is a guarantee but just look at all the LT busts over the past two decades 

 

Very true, fans have convinced themselves they are trading a 100% of being great for a 1% chance of being great.

Also people need to remember that although the LT probably does have a greater chance of being good, but even if they are they really only help your team a little bit compared to what being right on the QB does.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2022 at 12:01 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Was Cam Newton as much of a gamble as johnny Manziel?

If you remember very few here wanted him and it was considered a bad pick at the time by a lot of media. So a lot at the time many would've said yes. Lol

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2022 at 11:47 AM, ForJimmy said:

Honestly I’m thinking the best we can do (without Rhule ruining next year’s assets for our new coach), is trade low picks for Baker and draft a LT at 6. Don’t let Rhule extend Baker until AFTER the season. If he earns a new contract then that opens things up. If he struggles we let him walk at no expense to us. We have a promising OL and defense for our new coach and our early picks for him to draft his QB. Rhule gets his vet, our OL coach gets a great group of guys to work with and fans don’t have to watch Darnold again. This is all assuming the Browns eat a chunk of his salary too. 

I’ve felt this way for awhile now  

It is the best way to contain Tepper’s train wreck of a head coach  

Get that tackle.  One of the three should be there.  Pickup Mayfield.  If he plays well in McAdoo’s system, then options exist in 2023.    Jimmy G and that throwing shoulder surgery, just say ‘no’.

Rhule is the gift that keeps on giving in oh so many  ways   

I think Willis has so much potential  you can’t teach speed or arm strength but I just don’t see what he needs to thrive in Charlotte    If he had 3 more inches in height, prototypical . 

It is conceivable with  McAdoo, that Willis is drafted at 6, and another train wreck of an old LT is brought in  

 I wouldn’t cry if Willis is the pick  
 

Honestly, from the first time I saw him, he reminded me so much of Steve McNair   We should be that lucky  

McNair attended Alcorn State  still bigger than Liberty but by no means an Auburn in competition either 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure why everyone keeps talking about the Panthers paying him $50M/year. I don't recall anyone EVER saying he deserves that. I think something like what the Dolphins signed Malik Willis to would be good: 3 years, $67.5M but it will probably be something along the lines of Mayfield or Darnold which is around $35M/year.
    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
×
×
  • Create New...