Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rich Eisen on Pelissero's QB piece


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

No he couldn't. Did you watch the senior bowl? He ran away from those guys as well and they were NFL caliber with some first rounders. They even have their timed field speed and Willis was moving at least 2-4 miles per hour faster than the next fastest qb who was not Pickett.  Yall need to stop playing with Willis speed.

Screenshot_20220423-113258_Chrome.jpg

wtf is zebra technologies? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, The Huddler said:

nah thats bullshit

 

pickett could beat him in a straight line race and Willis was dodging scrubs that make him look more mobile than he is

Who cares about a straight line race?? How often is that going to happen for our QB. Willis is far more elusive and quick than Pickett, he showed it at the Senior Bowl against the same competition. He showed it against Syracuse and Va Tech (same schools Pickett played in the ACC). Willis is this year’s Trey Lance (small school QB with huge upside but needs the right staff and probably needs to sit a year). He isn’t the QB that our staff needs to draft, but he has some great upside. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

No he couldn't. Did you watch the senior bowl? He ran away from those guys as well and they were NFL caliber with some first rounders. They even have their timed field speed and Willis was moving at least 2-4 miles per hour faster than the next fastest qb who was not Pickett.  Yall need to stop playing with Willis speed.

Screenshot_20220423-113258_Chrome.jpg

Based on this Zappe will be the choice for our RPO offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly I’m thinking the best we can do (without Rhule ruining next year’s assets for our new coach), is trade low picks for Baker and draft a LT at 6. Don’t let Rhule extend Baker until AFTER the season. If he earns a new contract then that opens things up. If he struggles we let him walk at no expense to us. We have a promising OL and defense for our new coach and our early picks for him to draft his QB. Rhule gets his vet, our OL coach gets a great group of guys to work with and fans don’t have to watch Darnold again. This is all assuming the Browns eat a chunk of his salary too. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always either "there's no QB worth drafting" or "all the QBs will be gone before we pick". According to the Huddle it's never the right time to draft a QB.

To be fair last year was the year we should have drafted a QB. We could be now talking how we are going to draft a LT to protect Fields or Jones. We wiffed hard on that one. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I don't want to gamble at #6.

I see both sides, I really do.  You don't want to waste a pick on a guy you think has zero chance of making it but at some point a QB is almost always a riskier choice that one or more non-QBs.

For those that don't want to gamble on a QB this year, did you feel the same about Cam?  

Also in the last 10 years how many QB would you have been ok gambling on?  Luck, Lawrance...

Even though we were not in position to pick one of them, they went before our pick.

In the last 10 years how many QBs that were available to pick at our spot were you willing to gamble on?

19 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It's always a gamble. Y'all acting like a LT is a guarantee but just look at all the LT busts over the past two decades 

 

Very true, fans have convinced themselves they are trading a 100% of being great for a 1% chance of being great.

Also people need to remember that although the LT probably does have a greater chance of being good, but even if they are they really only help your team a little bit compared to what being right on the QB does.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2022 at 12:01 AM, Mr. Scot said:

Was Cam Newton as much of a gamble as johnny Manziel?

If you remember very few here wanted him and it was considered a bad pick at the time by a lot of media. So a lot at the time many would've said yes. Lol

Edited by carpanfan96
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2022 at 11:47 AM, ForJimmy said:

Honestly I’m thinking the best we can do (without Rhule ruining next year’s assets for our new coach), is trade low picks for Baker and draft a LT at 6. Don’t let Rhule extend Baker until AFTER the season. If he earns a new contract then that opens things up. If he struggles we let him walk at no expense to us. We have a promising OL and defense for our new coach and our early picks for him to draft his QB. Rhule gets his vet, our OL coach gets a great group of guys to work with and fans don’t have to watch Darnold again. This is all assuming the Browns eat a chunk of his salary too. 

I’ve felt this way for awhile now  

It is the best way to contain Tepper’s train wreck of a head coach  

Get that tackle.  One of the three should be there.  Pickup Mayfield.  If he plays well in McAdoo’s system, then options exist in 2023.    Jimmy G and that throwing shoulder surgery, just say ‘no’.

Rhule is the gift that keeps on giving in oh so many  ways   

I think Willis has so much potential  you can’t teach speed or arm strength but I just don’t see what he needs to thrive in Charlotte    If he had 3 more inches in height, prototypical . 

It is conceivable with  McAdoo, that Willis is drafted at 6, and another train wreck of an old LT is brought in  

 I wouldn’t cry if Willis is the pick  
 

Honestly, from the first time I saw him, he reminded me so much of Steve McNair   We should be that lucky  

McNair attended Alcorn State  still bigger than Liberty but by no means an Auburn in competition either 

 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Draft picks are better for cap management and production always outperforms athleticism over time.  
    • awesome interview. Love the guy. 
    • all the trades and using PFFs draft rankings and Gemini's analysis: This is a high-value mock draft that effectively uses trade-down strategies to rebuild the Carolina Panthers' defensive interior and add depth to a roster with multiple holes. By turning mid-round capital into a volume of picks, you've secured several "sliding" stars and developmental high-ceiling players. Based on 2026 PFF big board trends and player value, here is the analysis: Draft Grade: A- The Top Picks: Interior Dominance  * 19. Peter Woods (DT, Clemson): Getting Woods at 19 is a steal. Heading into the 2025 season, he was viewed as a potential top-5 talent. While his production dipped slightly, his 4.75 40-yard dash at 315 lbs is elite. He provides the Panthers with a versatile disruptor who can play 3-tech or slide outside.  * 63. Dontay Corleone (DT, Cincinnati): "The Godfather" is one of the best pure nose tackles in the class. Pairing him with Woods creates an immediate identity for the Panthers' front seven. PFF loves his "unmovable" anchor. Securing him at the end of Round 2 after trading down from 51/53 is excellent value. The Mid-Round Steals  * 83. Deontae Lawson (LB, Alabama): Lawson is a high-IQ "green dot" linebacker. Many scouts projected him as a late 1st or early 2nd rounder before an ACL injury in late 2024. Getting a 2-time Alabama captain at 83 to lead the defense is a massive win for culture and stability.  * 130. Drew Allar (QB, Penn State): This is the "high-upside lottery ticket" pick. Allar has prototypical size (6'5", 240 lbs) and a massive arm. His stock fell due to a 2025 ankle injury and inconsistency, but at 130, he’s a low-risk, high-reward backup/successor to Bryce Young if the former No. 1 pick continues to struggle. Trade Analysis & Late Round Value Your strategy of "tier-dropping" (trading 51 for 53/121 and 53 for 63/95) allowed you to stay in the same talent bracket while picking up Kevin Coleman Jr. (WR) and Genesis Smith (S).  * 168. Parker Brailsford (OC, Alabama): Great value for a technical center who can compete for a depth spot.  * 169. Tacario Davis (CB, Washington): At 6'4", he is a rare physical specimen at corner. PFF and other boards often have him as a Day 2 talent; getting him in the 5th round (via the 161 trade) is arguably your best value pick of the draft. Summary of Picks | Pick | Player | Position | School | Analysis | | 19 | Peter Woods | DT | Clemson | Elite traits; Top-10 ceiling. | | 63 | Dontay Corleone | DT | Cincinnati | Best run stuffer in the class. | | 83 | Deontae Lawson | LB | Alabama | Vocal leader; sliding due to injury. | | 121 | Kevin Coleman Jr. | WR | Missouri | Speed threat to complement the room. | | 130 | Drew Allar | QB | Penn State | High-ceiling developmental passer. | | 169 | Tacario Davis | CB | Washington | Massive reach/length for a late flyer. | Final Verdict You addressed the trenches aggressively and took advantage of "injury discounts" on Lawson and Allar. The only minor critique is that the roster still feels thin at Edge (until the 211 pick), but the sheer volume of talent added to the interior DL and Secondary compensates for it.
×
×
  • Create New...