Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Predict who we are taking


Khyber53
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

I'd love it to be Ekonwu, but I think he's going to be the first off the board.

The Jets and Texas are both supposedly looking at CB and WR if they stay and the Giants prefer Neal. I'd say its a good possibility that Ekonwu is there, and a decent chance they both are and the Giants take Thibs and whoever is left at 7.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we trade down into the first, it's going to be Pickett.  Gut feeling.

And we will likely get some IOL, WR, and DL with the remainder of the draft.  Hopefully IOL in the 2nd if we gain one.

If we stay put? Neal. Gut says Ekwonu and Cross are gone

1. Walker (lol)

2. Thibodeaux

3. Hutchinson? Stingley?

4. Ekwonu (They covet Jermain Johnson but this way they can try to get him at 10/trade up)

5. Cross (or Hutch?)

6. Neal (or) Trade Down w/ NYJ (10), HOU (13), PHI (15).  Land Pickett.

The big wildcard is still Houston.  If they pass on Hutchinson but the Jets covet getting an OT, Could we legimtiately have Hutchinson fall into our laps?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think we trade back if Willis is gone, take a LT in 1st late round, but with a 2 nd pick take a QB,(Howell or Riddick).

But I think they select a LB, or DE. Last year pick makes me think Rhule likes the unpredictable pick, Horn over Fields ex.

If Willis is there, no doubt, he's the only QB worth taking a risk at 6.

To p1ßß was

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current Rumor Mill top-5:

1-JAX: Walker DE

2-DET: Thibodeaux DE

3-HOU: Stingley CB

4-NYJ: Hutchinson DE

5-NYG: Charles Cross OT

6-CAR: Ekwonu, Neal or trade down..please just take a tackle

The idea of trading down to lose out on a top talent, just to position ourselves for a QB is not smart.  You stay put or trade up for a QB (philosophy wise, not this draft).  You don't trade back to make it seem like you're not reaching and get a R2-3 caliber QB instead.  

Edited by davos
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...