Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The one thing that is nagging at me about our QB pick...


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

But I'm NGL, and again, as an alum, I have vested interest in the Heels' success, but I can see that...  I dont think having a laid back attitude in interviews should have much, if any bearing on how I feel about a prospect, and likely has little to do with their on-field disposition...  but, watching him in 2020, it wasn't evident because they were having success and didn't encounter much adversity.  But, watching last season, I was bothered by his lack of fire at times.  His leadership did not show up in games, IMO.  He seemed very passive...  now, there are guys that can win that way - leading with their play rather than their voice, but when you watch Corral, his leadership immediately jumps off the screen and he is fiery.  It feels like guys would take a bullet for him, and he would do the same for them.  It makes a difference, imo.

There's other types of leadership than rah rah BS. Dyami Brown was VERY happy he was drafted by Washington.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like Corral’s deep ball issues are overstated. It’s not like he wasn’t capable of throwing a bomb or was way off target. They just didn’t throw it deep very often and when they did he was either on the money or would overthrow (which is what you want, underthrow and get picked). I’ve seen clips of him hitting Moore on deep passes in stride the year before last. It’s just a timing issue and that can easily be coached/developed. I’m really not too worried about him physically except for durability. The big question to me is can he handle the mental side of the game reading defenses, going through progressions etc…

  • Pie 6
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'd read a few places that his deep ball miscues were mostly from throwing on the run and not setting his feet - totally coachable, and we now have a guy who can do that in McAdoo, so I'm not overly worried. He's a rook who will make mistakes that he can learn from, plus he can hit the weight room to add about 10 more pounds of muscle if we're genuinely worried about his size/frame/build. It's all in how he approaches his opportunity and either makes it work or doesn't pan out. I'm ok with Corral, and I can't say I would have felt the same with any other QB this draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After rewatching Corral clips tonight, I have to say there's a few things that really stand out:

1) I'm not sure he really has durability concerns, rather, the guy absolutely propels himself into defenders when running.  He just wants the yards and TD and plays with spunk.  For a lighter frame (that he will build out), the kid is a warrior and I see why he's gotten dinged.  He does however need to cool that type of head leaning for yards style.

2) The mid-range placement is quite good (15-25 yards).  I can see the slight under or overthrows on his deep balls but in game clips (not just the highlights) he doesn't hospital ball any of the slants or seam routes.  Always a nice arc, leading the guys downfield, steps into his throws really well.  Will have no issue getting the easy chunks on the CMC screens and DJ slants.  

3) Here's an advantage of being in an RPO offense -- he's used to reading the defense those first few split-seconds and making a quick decision.  Uses his eyes to fake out defenders and he does NOT stare dudes down which I find pretty rare coming out of college.  The guys in pro-offenses with these awesome OL/time develop bad tendencies.  Corral had to face nasty DLs, process fast in-play and make quick decisions.  But his downside comes when he faces man.  I think he'll be able to run offenses effectively in the NFL against zone, but a tight, man heavy defense with disguised blitzes are where he may get into trouble.  

4.) I like his pocket navigation.  Good balanced footwork, not the best in class but he doesn't have glaring issues needing correction

--

Given it's McAdoo, I can see a lot of no huddle, west-coast, quick developing plays, not an extensive route tree; all designed to maximized YAC and keep an up-tempo rhythm.  An issue I see is that outside of CMC and DJ, we don't have the greatest RAC squad.  This is also why I think Higgins makes a run at the active roster and could stick.  But I actually see a bit of a void on the offensive skill player side of things.  Having a quick footed, lightning release RPO guy in Corral will translate pretty fine.  

I'm seeing a lot to be hopeful about.  He has top traits and intangibles that you can't teach which is the preferred type if we're going third rounder.   Not some volume guy with nothing that sets him apart from the other shmucks *cough* Grier

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, davos said:

After rewatching Corral clips tonight, I have to say there's a few things that really stand out:

1) I'm not sure he really has durability concerns, rather, the guy absolutely propels himself into defenders when running.  He just wants the yards and TD and plays with spunk.  For a lighter frame (that he will build out), the kid is a warrior and I see why he's gotten dinged.  He does however need to cool that type of head leaning for yards style.

2) The mid-range placement is quite good (15-25 yards).  I can see the slight under or overthrows on his deep balls but in game clips (not just the highlights) he doesn't hospital ball any of the slants or seam routes.  Always a nice arc, leading the guys downfield, steps into his throws really well.  Will have no issue getting the easy chunks on the CMC screens and DJ slants.  

3) Here's an advantage of being in an RPO offense -- he's used to reading the defense those first few split-seconds and making a quick decision.  Uses his eyes to fake out defenders and he does NOT stare dudes down which I find pretty rare coming out of college.  The guys in pro-offenses with these awesome OL/time develop bad tendencies.  Corral had to face nasty DLs, process fast in-play and make quick decisions.  But his downside comes when he faces man.  I think he'll be able to run offenses effectively in the NFL against zone, but a tight, man heavy defense with disguised blitzes are where he may get into trouble.  

4.) I like his pocket navigation.  Good balanced footwork, not the best in class but he doesn't have glaring issues needing correction

--

Given it's McAdoo, I can see a lot of no huddle, west-coast, quick developing plays, not an extensive route tree; all designed to maximized YAC and keep an up-tempo rhythm.  An issue I see is that outside of CMC and DJ, we don't have the greatest RAC squad.  This is also why I think Higgins makes a run at the active roster and could stick.  But I actually see a bit of a void on the offensive skill player side of things.  Having a quick footed, lightning release RPO guy in Corral will translate pretty fine.  

I'm seeing a lot to be hopeful about.  He has top traits and intangibles that you can't teach which is the preferred type if we're going third rounder.   Not some volume guy with nothing that sets him apart from the other shmucks *cough* Grier

Simplified route concepts are kind of a thing all over these days because it's gotten kind of hard to find college receivers that run a full route tree.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Simplified route concepts are kind of a thing all over these days because it's gotten kind of hard to find college receivers that run a full route tree.

That’s true—it’s also what McAdoo was known for that he was bringing from GB back in the day. Reread a few Giants articles when they brought him in before becoming HC. We definitely brought in an interesting dude. Depending on what new shades he’s added to his offense, it may be nice to have a consistently faster paced offense and not just one that only forces itself into no huddle situations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, davos said:

After rewatching Corral clips tonight, I have to say there's a few things that really stand out:

1) I'm not sure he really has durability concerns, rather, the guy absolutely propels himself into defenders when running.  He just wants the yards and TD and plays with spunk.  For a lighter frame (that he will build out), the kid is a warrior and I see why he's gotten dinged.  He does however need to cool that type of head leaning for yards style.

2) The mid-range placement is quite good (15-25 yards).  I can see the slight under or overthrows on his deep balls but in game clips (not just the highlights) he doesn't hospital ball any of the slants or seam routes.  Always a nice arc, leading the guys downfield, steps into his throws really well.  Will have no issue getting the easy chunks on the CMC screens and DJ slants.  

3) Here's an advantage of being in an RPO offense -- he's used to reading the defense those first few split-seconds and making a quick decision.  Uses his eyes to fake out defenders and he does NOT stare dudes down which I find pretty rare coming out of college.  The guys in pro-offenses with these awesome OL/time develop bad tendencies.  Corral had to face nasty DLs, process fast in-play and make quick decisions.  But his downside comes when he faces man.  I think he'll be able to run offenses effectively in the NFL against zone, but a tight, man heavy defense with disguised blitzes are where he may get into trouble.  

4.) I like his pocket navigation.  Good balanced footwork, not the best in class but he doesn't have glaring issues needing correction

--

Given it's McAdoo, I can see a lot of no huddle, west-coast, quick developing plays, not an extensive route tree; all designed to maximized YAC and keep an up-tempo rhythm.  An issue I see is that outside of CMC and DJ, we don't have the greatest RAC squad.  This is also why I think Higgins makes a run at the active roster and could stick.  But I actually see a bit of a void on the offensive skill player side of things.  Having a quick footed, lightning release RPO guy in Corral will translate pretty fine.  

I'm seeing a lot to be hopeful about.  He has top traits and intangibles that you can't teach which is the preferred type if we're going third rounder.   Not some volume guy with nothing that sets him apart from the other shmucks *cough* Grier

I think he's the best in the pocket/under pressure in this class, who's better? It's not Pickett or Malik

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve said it from the beginning. Corral has the most upside of anyone in this draft. That’s why they took him. If Corral hadn’t had the off-field stuff, the injury, and played in the Mountain West he would have been seen in the same light as Zach Wilson. 

The strength staff is going to put weight on him and work on his durability. The byproduct of that is picking up strength in his hips, quads, lower legs that is going to give him an even stronger arm. He is built like a high school senior right now. When he fills out and looks like an actual NFL QB it’s gonna be scary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stuff like this is why I did not become too hung up on one particular QB. If the staff selected Howell I would have hoped for the best. But they and others felt Corral was the better prospect. I honestly agree. Heels fans are going to have to move on it's been a couple days join us in the real world now folks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, WOW!! said:

I was a Howell guy and still think he was the most consistent producers in this QB class.. With Corral right behind him.. 

But we might have to admit maybe we were wrong...

Corral was Atleast consistently ranked 1 2 or 3 in the QB prospect rankings.. Howell wasn't.. And the league has spoken.. 32 teams passed on him 6x ...

Is this true?  Haven’t seen anything about this and very surprised by this if it is true…

Grabbed the wrong post…is it true he was drunk and high in interviews?

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I found an article that does a good job of explaining the position.  The position, in terms of athleticism and physicality, is less demanding than G or T.  So stepping into that role from G or T should not be a physical challenge, in general. However, a C must know how to snap 2 ways (it is not that difficult, to be honest) and must read defenses and call schemes.  They are the vocal leader of the OL--so maybe Corbett and BC have always been  out of position.  When Bryce talked about Corbett talking a lot and asking questions during film sessions when he was injured, this is what he meant.  I will bold the parts of this that apply to Corbett in a positive way.  It seems to me that the mental or cerebral challenges are the most important skill a center needs--if a person has played G, they (physically) will not be asked to do more--they will actually be asked to do less--physically.  Mentally and vocally, however, they must be leaders, quick decision makers, and students of the game---QUARTERBACKS, in other words.   Frankly, after reading this, I see why they feel confident in Austin Corbett and Brady Christensen at Center.  Both should be better players there.  The Center Position in Football: An In-Depth Guide Posted by Throw Deep Publishing Staff on June 23, 2022 Centers are both the underdog of their offensive line counterparts – and the brains behind the entire operation of the offensive line unit. Centers often find their way to the position being a little less naturally gifted than the guards and tackles positioned to their left and right. Usually a bit undersized, or a step slower, centers make up for this with a combination of high football IQ and gritty style of play that allows them to be the leader up front for the offense. Coaches talk a lot about their great players being extensions of coaches on the field, and centers have to be exactly that. The offensive line’s duty is much less fixated than that of skill players such as the running backs and wide receivers. They have calls in place, but ones that vary completely on the look that the defense shows on each and every play, whether it is a run or pass play. This is where the center comes in – as it falls on him to be the lead communicator and direct traffic for each and every play. The physical demands of the center position are plenty to speak of as well in their own right. Snapping the football, executing blocks in the trenches, and working up to linebackers are all part of the gig for the center position. Below will uncover even further the detailed demands of the position, and the crucial role the position plays in the success of an offense. What does a Center do in Football? As the team gets up to the line of scrimmage, it is the job of the center to direct his offensive line counterparts in the right direction to execute the play. He must be prepared to call out pass protections, identify the middle linebacker, and ensure the OL is on track in the run game to block the correct defenders. He has no choice but to be an extremely vocal leader, taking responsibility to put the offense in successful spots. As offenses go faster and faster in today’s game of football, the center must be a quick decision maker, which comes with intense film work, and deep studies of opposing defenses heading into each game. All of this shows the high-level parts of the job the center possesses before the play even begins. Moving to the physical elements of the job, the center is tasked with snapping the ball every play, getting the ball safely back to the quarterback, and immediately being prepared to go toe to toe against heavy interior defensive lineman. Whether it’s working a combination block up to linebacker level, occasionally pulling as a lead blocker, or picking up blitzes in pass protection, the center must be both athletic and strong enough to battle all game long against opposing defenses.     What are some other names for the Center Position? There aren't a lot of other popular nicknames for the center position in football, but they are sometimes referred to as the quarterbacks of the offensive line, since they have to make a lot of calls and "direct traffic" so to speak with the other four men at the line of scrimmage. What are the Skills and Body Type needed to play the Center in Football? Skills Football IQ  (Both Christensen and Corbett seem to be very smart--Corbett seems to be a student of the game) Leadership  (Based on Young's comments, Corbett is a leader in the film room and that will transfer to the field) Agility  (Guards require more agility than centers) Strength (lower body strength is key here, but both have shorter arms--arm length is less of an issue for Centers than T or G) Run-Blocking (Guards are usually better run blockers than centers--it is where they make their money--so I do not expect either to be a liability as a run blocker) Pass-Blocking  (Although shorter and more compact, Corbett has the longer arms--33 1/8" vs. Christensen's 32 1/4"--physically, Corbett is best suited to play center considering his physical make up--see below) Shotgun and Under-Center Snapping:  (This can be problematic if the mental aspects overshadow the perfunctory execution of tasks, but snapping is something that takes reps.  It may involve different hand padding/tape/gloves than usual, but nobody is physically unable to snap a ball to the QB standing five yards behind.  Few can get open, throw a 50-yard dime, or kick a field goal--but everyone can snap a football.  The issue is, of course, perfecting the timing, accuracy, etc. That can be done with reps.  I have no doubt that Corbett and Christensen have been doing it for months now.) Not all offensive lineman can be a center due to the mental demands of the position. Centers possess high-level football knowledge and leadership within the offensive line unit. Body Type (General Estimate) Height: 6’1-6’4 Weight: 310-325 Pounds Build: Thick, Compact Centers tend to be a bit undersized and less athletic compared to the offensive line. They often make up for this with more of a compact build combined with toughness and physicality. MHS Epiphany: A good example:  Ryan Kalil.  When we drafted him, we tried him (during his rookie year) at guard.  He sucked.  the reason?  If you ever talked to Kalil, you would realize that he is very intelligent.  Sarcastic, but intelligent.  He was not that big (maybe 285 to 290 when he played) and not tall (listed at 6'2" but he was 6'0"--maybe 6'1".  He struggled at guard because, physically, he was inferior.  At center, however, he could use his brain and leadership skills, so he became an all pro there.  He was a center--full stop.  Better athletes owned him as a guard, but as a Center, he was superior because he directed traffic effectively. I hope this makes people understand the decision the Panthers made.  It makes theoretical sense, when you think about it.  Based on interviews and insights, I think Corbett and Christensen are smart--I hope that translates to football smarts.  Not sure about Mays.  Pretty sure Zavala does not have it.  I bet Bozeman did not have it.
    • Scott Fitterer would have turned this trade down 😂
    • Here's the clip. I don't see the issue everyone seems to be worried about. He's been working this position for several years and now he'll prove it. https://youtu.be/tuul7aBtbGA?si=k-gyD4adheHnnMXu
×
×
  • Create New...