Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think there is a legitimate chance we sign Clowney? Considering his price tag, does it even make sense for us?


Julio
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Julio said:

There are rumors that the Browns offered a two year deal worth $24m. We’d need to match or beat that, which would near Haason Reddick territory at that point.

Why sign good players to fair contracts when you can sign subpar players for even more...its the Panthers way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Assuming Clowney can produce what he did last season with Cleveland (no reason to think otherwise), I can’t see how a short term deal wouldn’t make sense.

Of course there is definitely an argument that we should just let the young guys get their shot…so either way makes sense IMO

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Shocker said:

Assuming Clowney can produce what he did last season with Cleveland (no reason to think otherwise), I can’t see how a short term deal wouldn’t make sense.

Of course there is definitely an argument that we should just let the young guys get their shot…so either way makes sense IMO

I'm not a great fan of Clowney's but can see how it could help the Panthers. The DLine and ends use a rotation and between Clowney, Luvu, YGM and Burns, I can see the strengthen in that rotation. I don't see how it would adversely affect their development.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Rather have other guys out there. Melvin Ingram for example. Dunlap. Clowney is so overrated. 

This 100%. And we have to realize that we won't fix the defense with another one year rental of a sack specialist.

Our defense is soft and that's a down to the core problem that can't be fixed with a coat of paint or a flashy new doodad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

YGM is in year 3 and we need to see if he's part of the defensive core or if he's just a rotational guy. He has the build and tools to compliment Burns well, but has only flashed. Time to see if he can step up and put up starter numbers. 

I'd rather pass on DEs currently. Not sure where the relationship was at prior to cutting, but bringing Fox back on a cheap deal would satisfy me.

With so much in flux from the Coaching staff, down, this year is more of a 'wait-and-see' for me. I see Clowney as a trade you make midseason when you realize your team is a DE away from being special. May of 2022, we ain't there. Check back in November.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd hold on to Walker - we have no OT depth at all. Freeling is a block of clay - all the tools are there and he appears to have a great attitude. He needs serious work on his technique to realise his potential though.
    • From my watch last night: They weren't trading out of 19 unless it was a daft offer once Freeling got there. They were clearly antsy to get Hunter - and Minnesota actually called to offer the trade down. They weren't trading out of the third round pick once Brazzell fell to it (and Canales would have been happy with him in the second round). They traded back a lot on Day 3 - even if Morgan 'Babe Ruth'd' it with Lee, Hecht and Wheatley; they clearly weren't the only guys they would have taken at those picks. I'm curious to know which player caused the reaction at the start of day 2 (Dan Morgan): "of course they'd pick him"
    • Watching this confirms that this staff and front office is super high on Monroe Freeling. I wouldn't be surprised if he's gotta a real chance to win the starting LT job in camp. If he does, we can look to flip Rasheed Walker to a contender desperate for tackle help.   As for Ickey I still really like him and wanna extend him but based on how the staff was talking about Freeling it might be time for ickey to start taking some practice sets at guard if he wants to stay here as we are gonna have to have figure out a solution for the contracts of Lewis and Hunt.  My preferred scenario for the Oline in 2027 is Freeling-Ickey-Hech-Lewis-Moton. 
×
×
  • Create New...