Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ben McAdoo Presser


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, top dawg said:

The most interesting part to me was his seemingly nonchalant attitude about his particular offensive scheme. I know that some won't, but I like what I'm hearing. It sounds to me that he's going to let the players and their individual strengths decide what type of plays he devises. I can see someone either seeing him as a genius or a dumbass based on his approach. I can't wait to see what he comes up with.

It all boils down to results. I like the philosophy. You should always tailor your scheme to best fit your talent IMO. Force fitting square pegs into round holes just isn't very inefficient.

We'll see how it plays out.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As you might expect, not necessarily a huge amount of "meat" in here, but a few interesting comments about particular players (Corral in particular) and the way McAdoo goes about installing his scheme.

We should’ve gotten Nick Foles to remedy that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, stbugs said:

Yep, it’s good if a coach understands how their players fit and what improvements he can make to his scheme. Since he started his OC/HC with an established QB and at the time the most dynamic playmaker at WR, it will be interesting to see how he does with building up a rookie QB from scratch.

Yeah he worked on Eli's footwork/pocket presence but he already knew how to read defenses and call plays. Add in a rookie OBJ and it's still up in the air how much of an impact McAdoo truly had. Considering all that he still seems like he's an upgrade over Joe Brady, and Rhule is probably learning on the job more this offseason than he has the past 2 years. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daniel Jeremiah's top 50 players heading into the Combine.  Lol at the people still pining for Styles.  Dude will be LONG gone before our slot as I noted he would be.  Go ahead a keep drafting him at #19 if y'all want to keep ruining/making unrealistic mock drafts.   https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-s-top-50-2026-nfl-draft-prospect-rankings-2-0
    • Kmet is better than just 'meh'.   Mayer took a back seat to Bowers and is another TE that would relish a chance to start again.  Sanders, Temble and Evans is a better group of TEs than we've fielded during the Ian Thomas era, but it's far from stacked.  That's the problem, our TE room has sucked for so long now that  being 'better than crap' is apparently good enough--which it is not.
    • Why? Feels like we got a whole TE crew of almost Kmets. Loveland surpassed Kmet easy and relegated Kmet to Tremble like stats. Kmet’s decent years were because of volume. Kmet had over 90 targets twice in his career. Tremble’s career high in targets is 37. Tremble could produce Kmet numbers with the same volume so why would you ever go for Kmet? Loveland or Bowers type studs, go for it. Meh TEs, we’ve got plenty.
×
×
  • Create New...