Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Comparing Sam, Baker, and Jimmy vs. shared opponents last season


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mentioning passing stats without mentioning who had the better offensive lines and better players around him is very disingenuous

Both Baker and Jimmy had top 10 Offensive lines last year

Sam Darnold has a bottom 5 Offensive every year he has played.

Baker  and Jimmy had better recievers, runningbacks, o Line and Tight ends their entire careers. 

If you mention Darnold being a trash passer at least mention he has also had the worst offensive line and worse skill players around him compared to those two. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

The problem with Jimmy G is when the running game gets shut down and they need his arm he shits the bed.  Look at almost every playoff game this past year.  He played awful (yeah they still won until the NFC championship, but it was in spite of him).  Baker may be the same way because the Browns usually have a strong running game.  Baker is just younger with a bit higher of a ceiling and has shown he can play decent with bad coaches.  Jimmy G has had some great teams and coaches.  

We're gonna have Icky and BC on the left side. Our running game will not be shut down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, SammyFranchise said:

Mentioning passing stats without mentioning who had the better offensive lines and better players around him is very disingenuous

Both Baker and Jimmy had top 10 Offensive lines last year

Sam Darnold has a bottom 5 Offensive every year he has played.

Baker  and Jimmy had better recievers, runningbacks, o Line and Tight ends their entire careers. 

If you mention Darnold being a trash passer at least mention he has also had the worst offensive line and worse skill players around him compared to those two. 

The Office Reaction GIF

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

We're gonna have Icky and BC on the left side. Our running game will not be shut down.

I worry about this actually. Icky was a great run blocker in college, but BC doesn't get much push if he's our starting LG. Also teams will load the box (as they did last year). It is imperative that the QB can make it through his progressions and throw the ball down the field somewhat successfully to really help our OL and running game take off.

Edited by Michael G
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

There is virtually no difference between Sam and Baker as far as qbs are concerned.  You can cherry pick whatever stat you want to it won't matter. They both suck and  I can't believe the team wants to throw money and picks at another Sam Darnold clone that is a colossal asshole. 

I was leaning that way but both Jimmy and Baker had a better Oline.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SammyFranchise said:

Mentioning passing stats without mentioning who had the better offensive lines and better players around him is very disingenuous

Both Baker and Jimmy had top 10 Offensive lines last year

Sam Darnold has a bottom 5 Offensive every year he has played.

Baker  and Jimmy had better recievers, runningbacks, o Line and Tight ends their entire careers. 

If you mention Darnold being a trash passer at least mention he has also had the worst offensive line and worse skill players around him compared to those two. 

His supporting casts no doubt could have been better as far as OL goes but what sunk him through his NFL career are his turnovers and he had a high TO rate in college. Can't win if you can't protect the football.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Icege said:

That's the part that worries me most about Baker tbh. Jimmy is well liked in the locker room, while Sam "is an okay dude." Baker, on the other hand, has documented issues with teammates.

Hopefully the coaching staff doesn't look at that and chalk it up to "passion" that they feel was missing from the team. -_-

/rant


Yea emotions are ok ala Delhomme

but when people start saying they or someone is ‘passionate’ about something…it’s basically code word for annoyingly overbearing

it’s not a compliment 

the greats are emotional, which is ok

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, KillerKat said:

No he wouldnt. He would be too concerned over his completion percentage to take any chances. Pussiest QB I have ever seen.

I mean, Teddy has played for 4 teams and only has a losing record with the Panthers.   Of course he would have a winning record with SF.   Your describing both Teddy and Jimmy G.  Their game is pretty similar.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Catsfan69 said:

Jimmy and Baker had a much better line. 

Tua had a worse line than Sam and played significantly better.  It helps gives you a value of Sam which is significantly lower than a player like Tua who is on a make or break year with the Dolphins this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I disagree. For better or worse Bryce likes to throw floaters to predetermined areas regardless of what the reciever is doing and bringing those down is XL's bag. I wanted Ladd but I think this was right call. Burners and slot recievers are a dime a dozen but legit jump ball specialists are not.
    • ZCode Review (2024 UPDATED): An In-Depth Look at the Sports Betting System ZCode Review (2024 UPDATED): An In-Depth Look at the Sports Betting System Introduction ZCode has been a topic of much discussion in the sports betting community. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the ZCode system, examining its features, effectiveness, and user experiences. VISIT ZCODE OFFICIAL WEBSITE FOR BEST DEAL : https://rebrand.ly/zcode-system-webpage What is ZCode? ZCode is a sophisticated sports betting system that offers predictive analytics to assist bettors in making informed decisions. It's not just a betting platform but a comprehensive system that combines data analysis, expert insights, and community-driven strategies. The Technology Behind ZCode ZCode employs advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques to analyze vast amounts of sports data. This includes player performance, team statistics, and historical trends, enabling the system to generate accurate predictions for various sports events. Key Features of ZCode Data-Driven Predictions: Utilizes extensive sports data for accurate betting predictions. Automated Betting Systems: Features a range of automated systems for different sports. Community Insights: Offers access to a community of experienced bettors and sports enthusiasts. Performance Tracking: Provides transparent records of system performance and betting outcomes. Educational Resources: Includes tutorials and guides to help users understand and utilize the system effectively. How ZCode Enhances Sports Betting Informed Betting Decisions: Helps bettors make decisions based on data, not just intuition. Diverse Sports Coverage: Offers predictions for a wide range of sports, appealing to various betting interests. Strategic Betting: Aids in developing more strategic and successful betting approaches. User Experiences and Testimonials Users have shared positive feedback about ZCode, highlighting its effectiveness in improving betting strategies and the value of the community and educational resources. Subscription Costs and Value ZCode is a subscription-based service. Potential users should consider the cost against the benefits of enhanced betting predictions and community support. FAQs About ZCodeQ1: Is ZCode suitable for all levels of sports bettors? A1: Yes, ZCode is designed to be user-friendly for both novice and experienced bettors. Q2: Can ZCode guarantee winning bets? A2: While ZCode increases the chances of successful betting, it cannot guarantee wins due to the unpredictable nature of sports. Q3: How frequently are ZCode predictions updated? A3: The system regularly updates its predictions to reflect the latest data and trends. Conclusion: Evaluating ZCode's Impact on Sports Betting ZCode stands out as a comprehensive tool for sports bettors, offering a blend of data-driven predictions, expert analysis, and a supportive community. It's a valuable resource for those looking to enhance their betting strategies with informed decisions.   Visit the Official ZCode Website for More Information and Access https://rebrand.ly/zcode-system-webpage
×
×
  • Create New...