Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Mayfield Trade Thread... How about a 3 Way?


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Raleigh PF said:

While I'm a proponent of a good three-way, but this is awful.

How about everyone keeps the money where it is and the players simply trade teams - Darnold to SF, Garoppolo to the Browns and Baker to the Panthers. The money is already on the books anyhow.

Not a bad idea if they would try it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Riverboat Ron said:

I brought a 3 way scenario up with my wife when her friend was over the other day, now I’m sleeping in the dog house with a busted nose. Why is everyone so against 3 way trades?

Cause Carolina is not the only one getting screwed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Riverboat Ron said:

I brought a 3 way scenario up with my wife when her friend was over the other day, now I’m sleeping in the dog house with a busted nose. Why is everyone so against 3 way trades?

I am sure the extra guy would have just ruined your self esteem…she did you a favor 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2022 at 12:27 PM, DaveThePanther2008 said:

A 3-Team Baker Mayfield Quarterback Trade Is Being Floated (msn.com)

I swear writers come up with the dumbest ideas.  I don't think this has been put on the table but Carolina gets screwed in it.

We get Mayfield, Cleveland gets Jimmy G and we cough up 2 picks...

NOT NO BUT HELL NO. 

How about we take Mayfield and his cap hit, Cleveland takes Jimmy G, and SF takes Darnold and his cap hit.  Only threeway trade I would agree with.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

How about we take Mayfield and his cap hit, Cleveland takes Jimmy G, and SF takes Darnold and his cap hit.  Only threeway trade I would agree with.  

I'd go for that but I don't see Cleveland taking all of Jimmy G's contract. They'd be better off taking the all but 5 million for Mayfield. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'd go for that but I don't see Cleveland taking all of Jimmy G's contract. They'd be better off taking the all but 5 million for Mayfield. 

I certainly don't think it would happen.  I just don't like any other option.  

I think there is a possibility our coaching staff wants it.  Rhule is probably a little on the desperate side, and under some pressure to show improvement this year.  And getting even an average qb would help, whether its Mayfield or Jimmy G.  But I don't think should give up much to get said qb.

Not that the team listens to me.  🙂

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...