Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Patriots Joint Practice Day 2

ncfan

By ncfan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

philit99 Mentor

philit99

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

So.....

Horn looks like a top 10 pick.

Baker might be A Dude.

Darnold proved he is who we thought he was.

Might have some playmakers at WR.

OL could be suspect.

DL could be suspect.

Secondary might be nasty.

We will fight any MFer out there.

 

Anything else from the Pats practices I am forgetting?

So is Baker a dude or a dud?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

The world is soooo dramatic these days.

These practices pretty much ALWAYS have fights, but the media and Huddle act like they just discovered electricity or something.

I agree with earlier comment about DB's possibly being good, just hope they are not always tacking guys that have gashed the middle and into the secondary.

Oline, who knows.  Already better than last season, and should get better as they play together.  CMC being back will be a must to pull pressure off the passing game and open up some 1 on 1's.

If we are 3-3 to start the season, I think we will be much better in the last 10 games or so.  11-6 barring major injuries to key players

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

Yeah, I guess I'm just saying coaches aren't without their own biases and agendas...  had it been another guy, they probably don't throw him out of practice two days in a row.  But, judging from what Slater said, it sounds pretty cut and dry that he concussed him and then stood over him.  Perhaps in the heat of the moment, Robinson didn't realize or feel like he was standing over him, but it probably doesn't matter what he thinks now.

Latest word is they're going to review video of the play before deciding what happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Anyone get any clue if Baker/Sam are playing Friday? Seems dumb to sit 2 guys just because you won't pull the trigger on naming a starter. Would be interesting if Baker got to sit and Sam was out there with the 2's to start the game

Yea if they both sit, that will be a lot of PJ.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Ultimately the biggest flaw in Rhule's plan of having a "run first" team is that our franchise RB isn't capable of staying healthy. The second biggest flaw is that we aren't sure we have the OL to dominate in the run game.

And the third flaw is that it's a passing league.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...