Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What could have been. McD and Beane


 Share

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

@4Corners Thanks bro.  It's been so long since you poo'd my post I thought you were lost.

Glad to see you haven't lost your edge. 

I am sure it is important to you to poo every post of every person you don't agree with.

You're a classic. 

I don’t know who you are but I def didn’t care for the what if, revisionist crap. It

doesnt do any body any good 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

I don’t know who you are but I def didn’t care for the what if, revisionist crap. It

doesnt do any body any good 

Sure you do.  You spent over a year pooing the majority of my comments.  You are a child. 

It's preseason and many people post different topics. If you don't like a topic no need to say anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Very true but if you watched the game.  It didn't matter who was at QB.   Buffalo is loaded top to bottom and will be a force in the AFC.

McDermott and Bean > Rhule and Fitterer and it isn't even close. 

Preseason.

And it does matter these days.  You can have a team loaded with talent, but if you can't get at least above average play at qb, Superbowl wins are exceedingly rare.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, t96 said:

They’ve been very good so far but haven’t won anything yet. 

It’s a matter of time for those guys. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is the year for Buffalo. Most of the time, the team that wins the Super Bowl has knocked on the door a few times in the past year. I think they’re the team to beat in the AFC. It’s definitely the tougher conference right now though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

@4Corners Thanks bro.  It's been so long since you poo'd my post I thought you were lost.

Glad to see you haven't lost your edge. 

I am sure it is important to you to poo every post of every person you don't agree with.

You're a classic. 

He disagreed with me about something when I first started posting literally years ago and he still regularly poos my posts for no reason other than emotionally he's a 4 year old. I used to find it funny, like "oh look, the kid who eats paint chips is at it again", but now it just feels kinda sad.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I'm sure they do.  McDermott is the 10th head coach since Marv Levy left in 1997. No head coach lasting more than 3 seasons.  McDermott is going into his 6th season (2017-Present)

I am certain they are very appreciative of McDermott and Beane.

Fitts has been here less than two years. It’s way too early to say he’s a failure compared to Brandon Beane. As far as Rhule versus McDermott, yeah, you’re probably right about that one.

Edited by Khaki Lackey
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, 1of10Charnatives said:

He disagreed with me about something when I first started posting literally years ago and he still regularly poos my posts for no reason other than emotionally he's a 4 year old. I used to find it funny, like "oh look, the kid who eats paint chips is at it again", but now it just feels kinda sad.

I found it hilarious he said he didn't know who I was. My poo count is full of his SH*T lol.  Like you, he poo'd every post for like a year.  

I get if you don't like the content of my post and feel the need to drop a turd but every comment regardless what the comment was and is childish.

  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

I watch the total dismantling of Denver by Buffalo the other day.  It didn't matter who was playing the Bills were far superior than Denver.   I know it was preseason and everything is watered down but Buffalo did what they wanted to Denver all day long.  McDermott has them on the brink of a Super Bowl while we are still stuck in purgatory. 

Rivera wasn't bad and had 2 coach of the year awards with us but McDermott is showing he is the cream of the crop as far as head coaches go.  Futhermore, Billy Beane who was hired by Buffalo one day before we canned Gettleman. 

I still am pissed that we let a good GM go when we knew we were going to can Gettlemen.

What could have been. 

Never would have been, not here. 

There was no way the own would have fired those men's mentors, just to turn around and give them the jobs. 

Never happens that way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...