Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Myles Garrett calls relationship with Baker Mayfield “slightly complicated,” admits “some disagreements”


WarPanthers89
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Please tell me we're giving Ickey help this Sunday...

 

1 hour ago, panthers55 said:

McAdoo said he wasn't going to be alone in protection but did say that Ickey has to be able to hold his own 1 on 1 at times. 

QB roll outs to the right. Someone tell McAdoo and thank me later. 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, WarPanthers89 said:

Out of context or whatever I have no clue what his point is. Baker was a good teammate and invited guys out to dinner but it was weird? Maybe because Stefanski and Garrett didn't want him? The "adult" and "character concerns" don't really add up, just a guy that played hurt the whole season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Out of context or whatever I have no clue what his point is. Baker was a good teammate and invited guys out to dinner but it was weird? Maybe because Stefanski and Garrett didn't want him? The "adult" and "character concerns" don't really add up, just a guy that played hurt the whole season

I think the "but it was weird" was in reference to "...but Baker was a good teammate too, you know I hung out with the offense guys too and..." (obviously paraphrased). I don't think he meant it was weird that Baker took him to dinner / was weird himself, but the SITUATION was weird (which seems likely based on Garrett's comments)

edit: Yeah, the end he talks about "those relationships" being f'd, and he seems to be referring to the wider team relationships, rather than his with Baker.

Edited by mav1234
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep and that is why teams have different boards.     I would refine the lower valued position limitation mentioned here to the bottom quarter or third of the first round. There are a lot of really good players at these low value positions taken from right around where we pick and later. All positions I guess.  For us, some highlights  Gamble @ 28 Beason @ 25 Kelvin Benjamin and DJ Moore went late too but man I’d be fine with trading aback a little and getting a Beason level player.     
    • AND the last time we took a TE from Chicago that hadn't quite lived up to draft status it was Greg Olsen... bring this on nah
    • Guys let's not lose sight of the goal here. Ironically Dave Canales buddy Pete Carroll is a good example. In his later years with the Seahawks they "made the playoffs". Never went anywhere. Pete left town with his best friend Geno Smith and immediately proceeded to faceplant. Meanwhile the Seahawks hired a new coach traded away their best WR and signed Sam Darnold and they are your Super Bowl champions. Just because we backed our way into the playoffs going winless against New Orleans and barely splitting with the imploding Bucs for a 4-6 record in the last 10 games with the 26th passing offense does not mean we should be having a parade. Dave Canales team needs to take control of the division in 2026. Simple and plain.
×
×
  • Create New...