Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can they beat the Giants???


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 hours ago, joemac said:

Some of y’all need to get the thong out yalls bussies. This poo is pathetic. You would think we got beat by 40 today. Jesus Christ. 

You love some rhule don’t you??   It’s not just yesterday, it’s year over year over year of losing. It might as well feel like 40

Edited by Panthers Fan 69
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, joemac said:

Some of y’all need to get the thong out yalls bussies. This poo is pathetic. You would think we got beat by 40 today. Jesus Christ. 

Yeah, it doesn't matter how you died when you're dead already.

L is a L. Nobody is going to look at the boxscore for moral victories.

This isn't aw shucks highschool these are highly paid professionals that need to earn their millions instead of being coddled and made to play pingpong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Giants can run the ball and have a stud rb

the Panthers, yet again, cannot stop the run, so no

Either those D players can’t, won’t, or don’t want to tackle.  Gotta have some ‘want to’ to stop the run  

The D line is full of JAGS (including that #1 found DT) and the best player is actually a liability in the run game 

Edited by raleigh-panther
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2022 at 8:50 PM, rayzor said:

Any team that is built to run the ball is going to kick our ass.

We are buit and schemed to defend against one dimensional passing offenses.

Let me correct that.... We are built to defend against one dimensional college passing offenses. 

But again, we've got coaches who are college caliber so....

 

 

Imagine if we had to play the Titans this year. Henry would set records and make highlight tapes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is some weird stat like 80% of nfl games are won/loss by less than one score, it doesn’t fuging matter..0 win teams have like 10 close games…who cares

especially when it’s consistent. Consistently losing no matter by how many points is fuging awful in the nfl…it’s as bad as it gets and that’s all Rhule has done when he has been given all the ammo he wanted, players he wanted, and paid like a king

he cannot fuging do it…it’s painfully obvious and fans knew it mid season last year, some even before

so really the scariest part is Tepper being fuging inept and oblivious because we are stuck with him

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/11/2022 at 9:04 PM, Jackie Lee said:

Brissett was carving us up whenever they needed a first down, today did not build any confidence in our CB room to say the least. We shoulda at least picked one or the other to shut down, they kinda did whatever they wanted for 3/4's of the game

They made Jacoby effing Brissett look like a pro bowler

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...