Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think Matt Rhule gets one more game


PhillyB
 Share

Recommended Posts

I want to agree, Phil, but even for the most patient person, I just don't see how Tepper didn't can Rhule after last season.  This is beyond overkill now.  These 2 weeks have been completely expected and yet simultaneously unbearable.  I think he's going to be here way past his expiration and the season will already be lost...  I just can't shake the fact Tepper brought him back in the first place, and every week we see more evidence of Rhule not having any idea what he's doing, and he comes back the next week and does the same thing or worse.  It is the most hopeless I have ever felt as a fan.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fire Rhule and Snow walks.... that's fine.

Let Wilks take over the Defense.  I'd love to have him as HC, but I feel that would hurt the D too much.  Have Ryan move from QB coach to HC.  Make Macadoo earn it on the play calling.

If Wilks can turn the D into what they are capable of give him consideration at HC in 2023.

It's obvious they are not going to make it to next year, rip off the band-aid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Seifert gave us 1999. Had no defense but our offense was so entertaining to watch, and we didn’t even make the playoffs but it came down to the last week tiebreaker. 
 

One of my most nostalgic years. Moose. Walls. Jeffers. 
 

 

Oh yeah, proof that you don’t always have to win to be entertained and excited about the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Monrowed said:

I don’t understand the defensive philosophy for the play calls after the Panthers went up by a touchdown. It seemed like the team went in to prevent as if they were up by multiple touchdowns. They should’ve maintained the pressure that they were showing before that touchdown.

Looked like the giants began running a lot of misdirection and took advantage of the defense over pursuing. 
 

coincidentally, that is exactly how the giants beat Carolina last season with a different coaching staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...