Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Saints at Panthers GameDay Thread!


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Daddy_Uncle said:

The fact that there are people already wanting us to lose this early in the season just so Rhule can lose his job is ridiculous. I want us to win. I don't care who the coach is as long as we are winning. The team played with heart and energy today. They looked like they were playing for their coach. So that was encouraging to me

I completely agree. Special teams, and the effort by the defense was enough. Don’t sell this N.O. Team short. With Tampa losing we are one game behind in the South. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Missed the game live so gonna watch the replay now. I basically got the jist of it from Twitter so not really sure what minor details i'm looking out for. Sounds like it'll be more interesting to focus on the defense

Defense played well. Bent but didn’t break. Offensive rushing game was really strong for us today. Baker was a bit inaccurate early and often, and then our oline cracked when we would get into the saints territory. Laviska played excellent. Blocking, running and catching. 

Edited by TheCasillas
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, TheRumGone said:

No he hasn’t

Ok but what can you expect from a rookie 3 games into the season? I would’ve prefer he started at LG and Christensen at LT but not my call. I’m sure he’s doing the best he can but there will be growing pains.

Edited by Prowler2k18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

For folks at the game, how much boooing was going on?  

very little, mostly towards official calls.

I was in the suite around 30 yard line and I did notice that DJ Moore doesn't get open, EVER. And Robbie Anderson runs a lot of deep routes that are always double covered. We run very little motion before the snap. Honestly the offense is so vanilla and predictable, no wonder Mayfield is struggling. He did miss a some open players in the intermediate though.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...