Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should Shenault get more playing time?


YourLastThought
 Share

Recommended Posts

Probably some.   But not a lot.  You have to scheme him up.   And I’d rather them scheme up CMC or DJ.  
 

I think the Panthers should be rotating a lot more WRs in.  Outside of DJ, nobody else is good enough to demand a lions-share of snaps.  Robbie should have his cut for Higgins, Shenault and I still think they should have TMJ getting more work. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

After watching some film study of the offense. I blame it on the sorry as routes. There isn't any sharp cuts in their routes. Nothing to create separation. Just alot of strength routes, which the DBs can run with them. 

The routes are horrible and long developing garbage for the most part

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

After watching some film study of the offense. I blame it on the sorry as routes. There isn't any sharp cuts in their routes. Nothing to create separation. Just alot of strength routes, which the DBs can run with them. 

...they look like lazy practice routes....unless they're trying to set up a DB...but no bodies azz ever seems open.....you know...like I see with other teams...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CRA said:

Probably some.   But not a lot.  You have to scheme him up.   And I’d rather them scheme up CMC or DJ.  
 

I think the Panthers should be rotating a lot more WRs in.  Outside of DJ, nobody else is good enough to demand a lions-share of snaps.  Robbie should have his cut for Higgins, Shenault and I still think they should have TMJ getting more work. 

This is what most people don't get.  The underlying question is whose snaps is Shenault going to take.  Uh, a little off the top of almost everybody, which keeps WRs fresher, and keeps the defense adjusting because he is very different from our other receivers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well he’s a good player and puts in a lot of work. But we need to get other receivers involved. And we need to run the ball because those other teams in the playoffs run the ball and pass the ball too. So I think he needs to take advantage of his opportunities and be prepared to play even tho he’s not gonna get opportunities and we’re not gonna play him.  
 

it’s a process and it’s working.  Trust me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, trucpfan said:

Definitely why would we bench our most productive WR this season lol crazy the hate Robbie gets. Shi this year is our weakest link easy answer on who to bench for now.

Shi Smith is like a video game WR that has a lot of speed and you can build his other attributes up because he is always open. In real life though, it does not compute across the board and its nothing but a bunch of drops and terrible routes.

Also, the Robbie hate is not crazy. He is a malcontent pouter who wishes he could carry Ted Ginn's jock. He has super mediocre route skills and suspect hands as well as being one of the worst blocking WRs to step on the field. He may be our most productive WR, but that ain't hard to be right now. Let's not forget how many times Baker missed DJ this weekend. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
    • And you would've probably said the same thing about a lot of highly drafted WRs who busted.
    • dude..........   You are way to emotional here
×
×
  • Create New...