Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jason La Canfora on the Panthers Future and CMC


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Rhule likely isn’t forfeiting that much money if he lands a good power 5 gig. Plus there is happiness and his entire future (more money) at play in the long run. 

Brian Kelly LMAO makes more money than Rhule.  Miami, Michigan State, etc all pay their coaches more.  With ballooning salaries Rhule has decent odds if someone wants him of getting really good money and no longer being a miserable laughing stock. 

Lets hope some moronic/desperate AD of some power 5 school comes calling SOON!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CRA said:

What good new coach wants to come to an org that hasn’t won in a half decade, has no QB and no draft picks?  It will make us the default last pick IMO any good coach and they likely just wait another hiring cycle.  Where you go matters for not only player success but coaching success to.  You largely have about 3 years in this league to put up

Yeah, we aren't a built team and we aren't a good team. So how do people expect us to attract any good coaching talent if we don't have future draft capital to build with?

It's not logical. Especially when the organization now has a reputation for complete dysfunction.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Khyber53 said:

If you moved him to WR, he'd be the best receiver we had on the team and would be in the Deebo mode.

CMC is not a receiver, that's the reason he is effective as a pass-catching RB; he doesn't have to deal with the opposition's cornerbacks, as the receivers clear them out for him. He is most effective in his role, and really doesn't have to be Deebo, and is in fact more dangerous than Deebo in an offense that plays to CMC's strengths and versatility.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, top dawg said:

CMC is not a receiver, that's the reason he is effective as a pass-catching RB; he doesn't have to deal with the opposition's cornerbacks, as the receivers clear them out for him. He is most effective in his role, and really doesn't have to be Deebo, and is in fact more dangerous than Deebo in an offense that plays to CMC's strengths and versatility.

I am consistently amazed that some people believe taking away CMC's best skillset(his running ability) makes any sense. 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, we aren't a built team and we aren't a good team. So how do people expect us to attract any good coaching talent if we don't have future draft capital to build with?

It's not logical. Especially when the organization now has a reputation for complete dysfunction.

But Tepper has money and can pay them whatever they want 🙄

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

Exactly. So far Tepper has shown patience (for better or for worse) and that he's willing to pay. 

Any coach or GM would come here.

Disagree. The coaches and GMs have egos and want to win too, especially the coaches. If someone is willing to be saddled with this dysfunctional organization just for the money, they don't want to win and aren't the sort of GM or coach that the owner should hire in the first place. Rhule came to Carolina for the money. You want Tepper to repeat that mistake?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...