Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ADAM SCHEFTER: Panthers listening to Christian McCaffrey trade offers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

You gonna have to give more picks for sure, I keep seeing "a 2nd and Devin Singletary" thrown around...why? A almost 3rd and a RB that is a FA at the end of the year...no thanks. You would have more luck with a 1st and James Cook but that still not enough to me.

Yeah I don't want some bum ass RB in the trade, we don't need it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

Even their 1st isn't that appealing, pick 31 or 32 in the draft for a player that might or might not be a bust? Barely worth it, only even a consideration because we've traded so many picks away and fuged up our cap for no reason 

Having the potential for a fifth year option sounds good to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Varking said:

It works for the Bears. Montgomery doesn’t look the same and Herbert looks like a stud. Monty will walk at the end of the year and his replacement is there. Bears will keep drafting RBs in round 5 and rotating them. 
 

It’s like the Steelers and WRs

Almost everyone else in the NFL has been on this program for years now.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Why would we want Singletary?? He is a FA after this season. For Buffalo I’d want at least a 1st and Cook.

Singletary has proven that he can be productive. Cook hasn't done poo TBH. The pick is the most important thing. Singletary ain't the biggest guy in the world, but Cook is even smaller. Cook's ceiling is probably 3rd-down back. Singletary has at least played every down and has years of NFL conditioning under his belt.

Take a look.

https://buffalowdown.com/2022/05/23/buffalo-bills-devin-singletary-running-back-rankings/

Edited by top dawg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'd literally rather have a later mid-round pick (say a 5th) for Robby. Why would I want a RB who has less than 1000 total yards in his career that's now in it's third year? You can sign guys like that off the street.

Are you actually certain you can get that for Robbie though? 🤔

I'll confess I don't know what the deal is with Akers or why he wants to be traded. Obviously if he's looking for an uncontested number one role, that's not available here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...