Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ADAM SCHEFTER: Panthers listening to Christian McCaffrey trade offers


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

That’s not my point. Singletary’s contract is only through this season. We obviously aren’t making a run this season and should be trading for future assets. Cook is a rookie 2nd rounder with explosive speed. He can be an asset for the future of our team. 

I get it now, though I will say that we could trade for Singletary with the promise of an extension

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Fitterer is a fuging moron

why? they just leaked "the bar" now teams know where to start when negotiating. Obviously we wont get two first round picks. However, now teams know where to start negotiating down. If they dont call, then they dont call. 

 

The bottom line is that if we trade CMC we are putting ourselves in dead cap hell.... the only thing that makes that easier to deal with is cheap talented players in the way of early round picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

why? they just leaked "the bar" now teams know where to start when negotiating. Obviously we wont get two first round picks. However, now teams know where to start negotiating down. If they dont call, then they dont call. 

 

The bottom line is that if we trade CMC we are putting ourselves in dead cap hell.... the only thing that makes that easier to deal with is cheap talented players in the way of early round picks.

If that dumb motherfuger can get a first he needs to accept it the second it comes in.  Dont be cute with this.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

why? they just leaked "the bar" now teams know where to start when negotiating. Obviously we wont get two first round picks. However, now teams know where to start negotiating down. If they dont call, then they dont call. 

 

The bottom line is that if we trade CMC we are putting ourselves in dead cap hell.... the only thing that makes that easier to deal with is cheap talented players in the way of early round picks.

Yep

I’m not just trading CMC to trade him. A team needs to send something of value to make absorbing that dead cap hit worth it.

CMC is 26 year old superstar when healthy. 

CMC would be a major help for our rookie QB next year BUT trading CMC also improves our chances of landing the #1 pick

I do believe it needs to be at minimum one first rounder. Then some other picks. I sure as sh!t don’t want Singletary or Cook

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

If we gave up McCaffrey for a single first, especially one expected to be low, that's what I'd consider dumb.

You are nuts, if we can get a first for cmac and his contract that is charlie sheen level winning.   I dont understand the pedestal you guys are putting cmac on.   Running backs dont move the needle in the modern nfl.  They just dont

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yep

I’m not just trading CMC to trade him. A team needs to send something of value to make absorbing that dead cap hit worth it.

CMC is 26 year old superstar when healthy. 

CMC would be a major help for our rookie QB next year BUT trading CMC also improves our chances of landing the #1 pick

I do believe it needs to be at minimum one first rounder. Then some other picks. I sure as sh!t don’t want Singletary or Cook

If you are talking Bills or anther late first it would need to be a 1 & 3.

 

I rather hope we trade him at this point like others before him he deserves more than this sh*t show of a franchise.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...