Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do you think Tepper promised Wilks the permanent job if he loses out?


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Or he saw his Arizona tenure and thought that’s a man that can guarantee the No 1 pick 

I think that is what happened.  There were 3 coaches with HC experience, he chose the only one who tanked for the #1 pick.  When asked if Wilks could turn it around, Tepper laughed and then caught himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Cpt slay a ho said:

Wish it was the case but I think they’re that bad, that might have been the worst offensive game plan since the d will in wildcat formation the entire game vs the falcons years back….

It's worse. That team won the game.  This team was, well I don't know what it was. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, in my defense, I didn't know Wilks was part of the Flores lawsuit.

That being said...  I also don't care.  This thread was half in jest, because honestly, wtf do we have to talk about worth talking about anymore this season.  Our team fuging sucks and we have a fuging horrible owner.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don’t need Wilks. Just the way he talks and how he carry’s himself screams “I’m a conservative, defensive minded head coach who plays not to lose instead of playing to win.” 
 

I want a young and offensive mind for our next head coach considering we are absolutely drafting a QB no 1. Wilks ceiling is Jeff Fisher or at best John Fox and even that is being VERY generous.

Edited by panthersgreenville
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...