Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What’s your 2023 QB big board (including Corral)


Wundrbread33
 Share

Recommended Posts

There’s been a handful of 3rd to 4th rounders at QB that just never really even made it to the field for a variety of reasons—have to face the fact Corral may be one of them.

Garrett Grayson, Sean Mannion, Hackenburg, James Morgan, Kellen Mond, Will Grier..it just happens. Corral is kind of floating in that territory until he can at least get healthy, sniff the field and see some action.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, saX man said:

There’s been a handful of 3rd to 4th rounders at QB that just never really even made it to the field for a variety of reasons—have to face the fact Corral may be one of them.

Garrett Grayson, Sean Mannion, Hackenburg, James Morgan, Kellen Mond, Will Grier..it just happens. Corral is kind of floating in that territory until he can at least get healthy, sniff the field and see some action.

Entirely possible...

It occurs to me that one wildcard in this situation might be what happens with Ben McAdoo. If Wilks got the job and decided to keep him (possible) or in the much less likely sounding event that a new coach was hired and kept him aboard, he might stump for Corral.

I'd probably consider McAdoo staying a long shot also but again, you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MechaZain said:

Sound ridiculous calling a couple of preseason drives with the backups "playing in the NFL".

Backups? 98.9% of them are driving trucks or selling insurance right now...

Rhule was pulling form his college bag and wanted to humble Corral, and the result was season long IR....its in the mountain of reasons Rhule was fired. Its unknow cause it was a serve injury weres hes at, could take over 9 months for a full recovery....thats into OTAs mini camp etc...

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Backups? 98.9% of them are driving trucks or selling insurance right now...

Rhule was pulling form his college bag and wanted to humble Corral, and the result was season long IR....its in the mountain of reasons Rhule was fired. Its unknow cause it was a serve injury weres hes at, could take over 9 months for a full recovery....thats into OTAs mini camp etc...

I would make a statement in agreement but according to @Jackie Lee that would be spamming.

Lips Are Sealed Shut Up GIF by VH1

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Looks like these guys are having that discussion (after looking at the same Levis clip posted on here earlier)...

 

Levis is this years Zach Wilson. Got a boat load of talent for sure and a gifted arm. Still think Wilson could be the guy one day too early to write that book on him yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1) Stroud

2) Young

3) Hooker

4) Corral

5) Levis

Stroud and Young are neck in neck and they both have issues, but I think they'd still be good. Hooker is just a little behind them, but I'd still be thrilled with him. I still believe in Corral, but I like those other three ahead of him. Levis could be good as well, but I need to see more. Game this weekend should help my opinion.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, rayzor said:

1) Stroud

2) Young

3) Hooker

4) Corral

5) Levis

Stroud and Young are neck in neck and they both have issues, but I think they'd still be good. Hooker is just a little behind them, but I'd still be thrilled with him. I still believe in Corral, but I like those other three ahead of him. Levis could be good as well, but I need to see more. Game this weekend should help my opinion.

Hooker vs Levis will be a good one, considering what Hooker did against Bama.  I need to see Levis air it out if they get behind 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...