Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Now that Young/Stroud will be gone before the Panthers pick, what FA QB do u want


 Share

Recommended Posts

Our only hope is to fail next year for our QB.

We are on yet another fuging stupid ass 5 win trajectory, never learning. We will not start to win until we draft our future. Worthwhile FAs have a choice (spoiler, it won’t be here), pointless topic.

And this team’s scouting and FO are NOT talented enough to survive a San Fran/Lance or Watson type situation. That would be fuging suicide for our idiot, inept owner who doesn’t even know how to properly hire/interview for a GM or HC.

Edited by onmyown
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Give these head in the clouds types their wish and play Corral 

Is our GM among the head in the clouds types. Scouts? OC? Owner? The organization as a whole picks a quarterback. 

Picking a QB at any point in the draft is fun for any homer. It's the what if? What if he can lead this team like he did Ole Miss? 

Sitting on the bench in New Orleans was a QB nobody believed could take the Carolina Panthers to the Superbowl.

There was nothing physically special about Jake Delhomme. Some of his passes were ducks, but they got there.

What Jake lacked in height, athleticism he made up for with HEART. That's why him and #89 understood each other, you'd never question pre Tommy Joan Jake's heart or his ability to throw some ugly ducks pretty far.

I can't wait until Corral gets his chance with the starters. Coming in he said he'd pursue the starter position aggressively.

He actually looked good in the few practice reps we got to see, his fade throw in the end zone is a thing of beauty nobody else was reported to have swished it twice like Corral did, accuracy, touch. Baker did once, lucky.

The reporters were gushing over his quick release and him being the first guy on the field. That's skill, character, determination and at Ole Miss he was fearless, aggressive and most of all played with HEART.

People get injured. All football players do. He shouldn't have played in the bowl game, he should have continued to heal that injury protected his draft position but he played. 

He damn sure shouldn't have been made to play with a rag tag bunch of guys who probably couldn't have made Corrals highschool squad and somehow expected a Rhule assembled third string play like first stringers all around him. Good luck with that to, like any QB ever. Sabotage. 

 

 

Edited by rippadonn
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Is our GM among the head in the clouds types. Scouts? OC? Owner? The organization as a whole picks a quarterback. 

Picking a QB at any point in the draft is fun for any homer. It's the what if? What if he can lead this team like he did Ole Miss? 

Sitting on the bench in New Orleans was a QB nobody believed could take the Carolina Panthers to the Superbowl.

There was nothing physically special about Jake Delhomme. Some of his passes were ducks, but they got there.

What Jake lacked in height, athleticism he made up for with HEART. That's why him and #89 understood each other, you'd never question pre Tommy Joan Jake's heart or his ability to throw some ugly ducks pretty far.

I can't wait until Corral gets his chance with the starters. Coming in he said he'd pursue the starter position aggressively.

He actually looked good in the few practice reps we got to see, his fade throw in the end zone is a thing of beauty nobody else was reported to have swished it twice like Corral did, accuracy, touch. Baker did once, lucky.

The reporters were gushing over his quick release and him being the first guy on the field. That's skill, character, determination and at Ole Miss he was fearless, aggressive and most of all played with HEART.

People get injured. All football players do. He shouldn't have played in the bowl game, he should have continued to heal that injury protected his draft position but he played. 

He damn sure shouldn't have been made to play with a rag tag bunch of guys who probably couldn't have made Corrals highschool squad and somehow expected a Rhule assembled third string play like first stringers all around him. Good luck with that to, like any QB ever. Sabotage. 

 

 

The thing about Corral playing with all the rag tag bunch was he looked like he fitted in. Normally good players stand out around scrubs not our Matty boy. And for the love of god stop comparing him outlier QBs like it’s the norm and not the exception 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Varking said:

Florida just took a four star QB that originally commit to the Hurricanes last night. It makes me lean towards Richardson entering the draft. DJ Lagway may still commit too. If he does, Richardson is for sure going pro. I’d roll the dice on him. 

Pair him with the OC from Philly as our HC. Spend some money on Geseki in FA 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

The thing about Corral playing with all the rag tag bunch was he looked like he fitted in. Normally good players stand out around scrubs not our Matty boy. And for the love of god stop comparing him outlier QBs like it’s the norm and not the exception 

In a normal situation I would agree.  Corral preseason was not normal and it is the exception.  He was given very little reps in practice.  Secondly, his second game was far better than his first before he got hurt. This is what makes your argument flawed.  I think if you give him valuable reps he'll show he's worthy of leading this team.  

I guess we'll see where we end up in the draft and see what we do.  I won't be surprised if we trade down and gain picks or take BPA in an area of need. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

In a normal situation I would agree.  Corral preseason was not normal and it is the exception.  He was given very little reps in practice.  Secondly, his second game was far better than his first before he got hurt. This is what makes your argument flawed.  I think if you give him valuable reps he'll show he's worthy of leading this team.  

I guess we'll see where we end up in the draft and see what we do.  I won't be surprised if we trade down and gain picks or take BPA in an area of need. 

To be fair I don’t think there was much room to get worse for his second start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pantherj said:

At this point with the top 2 QBs probably out of reach we may need to give Corral his shot. He looked horrendous in preseason, but that's just preseason. Maybe he can put something together next season and beat out PJ or whoever else is on the roster. Things just got very bad for next season and we still have more NFCS games to play, not to mention bad teams outside of the NFCS.

This is why I want to see Darnold.

We've assembled a brick wall, let's see if he can play behind it. We already know Walker and Mayfield are terrible.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aussie Tank said:

Pair him with the OC from Philly as our HC. Spend some money on Geseki in FA 

OC from Philly, Minshew as our vet, and someone like Richardson could work. Eagles have also been carrying 3 QBs so we could roll with Minshew, Richardson, and Corral. Minshew can start the year with Corral as backup until Richardson is ready. I wouldn’t hate this idea at all. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

The thing about Corral playing with all the rag tag bunch was he looked like he fitted in. Normally good players stand out around scrubs not our Matty boy. And for the love of god stop comparing him outlier QBs like it’s the norm and not the exception 

How is a QB supposed to look good when their OL consisted of:

  • LT Dennis Daley
  • LG Mike Horton
  • C Cade May's
  • RG Deonte Brown
  • RT Austin Pleasants

Not even prime Cam Newton could uplift that offense, and that's just the OL.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...