Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Before it becomes a topic of conversation this off-season


LinvilleGorge
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, saX man said:

I just can't see a new coach being comfortable with something like that.  I know Minshew has been a bit of a dream bridge candidate for many fans (of multiple teams), but if you look beyond him, it's slim pickings.  Thin margins at play.  

I honestly believe that we will see more QBs change teams this offseason than we have ever seen before in a single offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Said it elsewhere but it bears repeating here...

Scott Fitterer has repeatedly stated his belief that the best strategy for team building is to draft a quarterback and build around them. With Matt Rhule gone, I expect that to be the path we follow.

It could conceivably be with Matt Corral, but I think it's more likely we'll draft someone else this April and focus on them.

I agree with you, although I do think that Corral will stick around for a couple of years, assuming he recovers fully from his injury, and some other team doesn't come in and make a decent to good trade offer.  Corral will at least have a shot at being the backup.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sgt Schultz said:

There were a lot of teams with concerns about Fields.  I never fully understood all of them.  But even so, him dropping below Lance makes my head hurt, too.  I had my own concerns about Wilson, but the consensus was otherwise among the people paid to make that call so I just figured that was my own stupidity. 

Had the 49ers not gone all in on Lance, who knows where he would have been drafted?  He could have fallen down the board below Fields.  It only takes one team to elevate a guy's draft position. 

Lance is a prime example of the "hey this guy is super athletic; let's take him and teach him to be a quarterback" idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

I honestly believe that we will see more QBs change teams this offseason than we have ever seen before in a single offseason. 

Could very well be the case--pending the Brady & Rogers (and maybe even Stafford) decisions, the NFC's only QB sure teams are the Cowboys, Eagles, Cardinals, Vikes (maybe), & Bears (maybe)

AFC has more secure QB spots but the NFC could be open season, QB wild west, and there aren't many good QBs out there.  Could be a lot of big swings forthcoming.

It's also why this draft may see a reverse situation compared to last year's with teams getting aggressive to get a guy they like, bet on potential and develop him.  I will tell you, this class has more than a handful that are more favorable than pretty much the entire 2022 QB class per my only bird.  McKee & Ward are quite liked, at the least in this one west coast FO.  

If you asked where Pickett fell in this class, I think you'd be surprised.

 

     

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Lance is a prime example of the "hey this guy is super athletic; let's take him and teach him to be a quarterback" idea.

Lance was a good passer in college. His biggest issue in the talent level gap between his conference and the NFL IMO. Give him some time…

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheCasillas said:

but what about....

Kyler Murray
Derek Carr
Zack Wilson

Lamar Jackson

Daniel Jones

Aaron Rodgers

Carson Wentz

Baker Mayfield

Sam Darnold

Trey Lance

 

Lots of former first rounders potentially going to be available this offseason... (i know DC4 was 2nd rd)

None of the above. 

Draft and develop our own qb.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, frankw said:

Roll the dice on a round 1 quarterback and be done with it.

This is basically the only option at this point.  I feel we are getting a guy no matter where our selection is even if that means "reaching".  Still think we are picking around 5/6/7 and still think we are getting AR.  Just makes too much sense. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

This is basically the only option at this point.  I feel we are getting a guy no matter where our selection is even if that means "reaching".  Still think we are picking around 5/6/7 and still think we are getting AR.  Just makes too much sense. 

If we miss on the top 2 QBs this draft, I think trading back is the right move. Stack picks and draft a Richardson/Duggan/Penix type with one of our 2nd rounders. Let them battle with Corral next year and if the results are terrible, trade the farm for Drake Maye or Caleb Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

the rise of Trey Lance and Zach Wilson post college career and the fall of Justin Fields in that draft continues to scramble my brain.  Fields was always 1b with Trevor.   

But an article just recently said that Levis is a better prospect than Young or Stroud because he played with less talent around him (sarcasm)! Lance and Wilson had the "tools" to succeed but they also didn't lead their programs to bowl wins/championships.  At least Young, Stroud, Fields have played meaningful high stakes games in their collegiate careers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ECHornet said:

If we miss on the top 2 QBs this draft, I think trading back is the right move. Stack picks and draft a Richardson/Duggan/Penix type with one of our 2nd rounders. Let them battle with Corral next year and if the results are terrible, trade the farm for Drake Maye or Caleb Williams.

It might be the right move but I doubt it happens for a ton of reasons.   For starters you need a partner that is going to give up the farm for your pick and more times then not its for a qb.  I think if they like a Richardson/Duggan/Penix type player they will just pick them and not get cute.  The combine is going to be extra interesting for us this year. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think part of the reason the 49ers were trying to part company with Jimmy G was his contract.  If I remember right he was going to cost them a Brinks' truck and, while they did not see him as the long-term answer, they were scheduled to pay him as if he was.  Nobody else wanted that contract, either.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MORGAN ON PLAY CALLER FOR CANALES   "I think that's really his [Canales'] call," he stated. "I think if he wants to promote somebody into being the play-caller or bring somebody from the outside. We haven't really talked about that. But that is something that I'm sure we'll talk about. We talk about every decision together. If he feels like he needs to add somebody or promote somebody into being the play-caller, then I trust him."  
    • Dude, he cannot see the field, when his feet are not set he throws ducks.   What the fug are you watching?
    • I'm looking at the final drive, and that's where I'm laying the blame at Bryce's feet. Stepping up to the line, 38 seconds left, 3 time outs on the clock. 30 yards needed to attempt a FG. It's not Bryce's job to call the plays, that's DC's and it was terrible play calling.  It's Bryce's job to read what the defense is giving him at the line. The middle of the field is open. Rams are guarding against the deep ball and bringing pressure leaving the middle of the field ripe for the taking. Knowing his line not holding up for long, Bryce should have read the defense, called the audible, and thrown to the middle of the field for 6- 8 yards, like you said, quick slants would have worked. Then run either hurry up or call a TO. We had time. He has to make the adjustments. Any QB has to make the adjustments.  The pass Horn dropped hit his hands but was at his knees. Should he have slid and caught it? Probably. Was the pass a good one? No it wasn't. Both players were at fault, not just Horn. Let's not pretend that Bryce threw a beautiful pass that hit the receiver chest high right in the hands in perfect stride because that damn sure wasn't the throw.  The defense didn't choke away a lead. They never had a real lead. Choking away a lead is being up by multiple scores late in the 4th and losing. We were up by 4 and handed the ball back to a potential MVP with an All pro WR and potential future HoF WR2. One score games in the 4th are a slug fest. 28-3. That's choking away a lead.  I don't solely blame Bryce for the game, but you seem to solely blame the defense for the game because they went to prevent after losing Horn. You are forgetting the short field that the offense left them that led to the early Puka TD on one of our 2 failed 4th down conversions. Our defense has been given very limited resources over the past 3 years while we have tried to put everything possible around Bryce. We added a little bit to the D this year after giving up a NFL record in points last year. Our defense overachieved based on what they've been given to work with. 
×
×
  • Create New...