Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

All aboard the Wilks Wagon


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Coaching success is a mixture of things.

First off, you have to be a leader. I don't think anybody doubts Wilks is that. Players respond to him like you hope players would.

The second thing you need is the mind of a chess master when it comes to strategy and planning. Does Wilks have that? Don't know.

But if he doesn't, he can make up for it by having a good eye for staffing. One of the reasons Sean McDermott has been so good is that he built a killer staff. Can Wilks do the same?

So basically, he's got the leadership part down. Whether he can also be the chess master or the staff builder is yet to be seen, but those things are necessary if he wants to be a winner.

True, the way it's playing out it seems like McDermott may have gotten more credit than deserved. The Josh Allen/Daboll connection was legit. Dorsey seems to be regressing to the Cam philosophy of running the guy into the ground if Diggs isn't open

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

That's why his staff choices should be critical in his interview for the full time gig. That would be one of the main boxes he would have to check if I were on the hiring committee. 

This is why I’d rather a young offensive mind as our HC. Say Wilks hires a good OC the way the league is they get scooped up to be HCs I don’t think the lad has the connections to keep bringing in quality OCs. But if we get the Offensive HC he can install his scheme through whoever OC they desire. I believe DC’s are easier to replace just get an old hard nosed ex HC to run the D 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Wilks Positives

Winning at home.  That's a good thing.  Getting PANTHER FANS back in the house.

Defense is playing lights out and keeping us in games.

Has the locker room.  Players believe in him and that goes a long way sometimes. Keeping him as our HC keeps continuity in the locker room.  

Wilks Negatives

Not very good at changing game plans when things don't go right.  Had zero answers for Cincinnati.  

Gotta win on the road to be a playoff caliber team.  So far we are 0fer. 

Not sure if he'd change offensive coordinators.

Bring in a New Head Coach. Positives

Most likely an offensive mind with imagination and can get the team to put up some points.

Fresh start after a crazy 2.5 years worth of Rhule.  Clean the closet.

Bring in a New Head Coach. Negatives

Could turn out to be a terrible hire and sets us back at least 2 years.

Bringing in a different type of offense and defense that requires players whose skill set is different than what we have on the roster.  Could be a total rebuild.

MY TAKE

First we need to forget about Wilks time in Arizona.  He was given a pretty rotten hand to play with.  He was never given time to build his team.  Arizona's management forced Rosen on him.  Arizona had their eye on Kingsbury and 3-13 was the perfect reason to dump him but not all Wilks's fault.

Keep Wilks.  He has the locker room and the team, IMO, love playing for him.  McAdoo run first offense is OK but struggles when defenses focus on stopping the run.  I would replace McAdoo with a good OC.  I would want an OC that can build a good staff that when he moves on as a HC his protege continues the same offense.  

I'm inclined to keep Fitterer and Fits need to continue to improve our trench players.  Offense and Defense.  While we can't completely focus on these positions.  Keeping our QB upright goes a long way in getting the best out of our QB and putting pressure on the QB for the defensive side of the ball.  Fits needs to find gems in the latter rounds.  

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

Wilks has been admirable but he's a Ron Rivera type of coach. I think our defense is just very good which is masking how horrible the offense is. We need a bright offensive coach.

As much as we would like to say we hate Rivera.  He has WFT above .500 and pushing to make the playoffs with Taylor Heinke as their QB.  McDermott, from the same tree, has Buffalo as a top team.

You may not like the defensive side, but it does work.  Salah for the Jets in another positive for defensive head coaches.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that he is a hometown product, but he’s very much Rivera 2.0. He likes playing a ball control offense which is great as a game plan but not as a scheme, to me at least. I’d personally prefer an offensive minded coach who also calls plays, therefore if we get a good offense we won’t be in danger of losing anyone. 
however, if somehow he coaches the team into the playoffs this year I’m down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

This is why I’d rather a young offensive mind as our HC. Say Wilks hires a good OC the way the league is they get scooped up to be HCs I don’t think the lad has the connections to keep bringing in quality OCs. But if we get the Offensive HC he can install his scheme through whoever OC they desire. I believe DC’s are easier to replace just get an old hard nosed ex HC to run the D 

Bringing in someone else's OC to be head coach and call the plays does not ensure he's a good head coach either. You guys fall for whatever offense is showing off and then say that coordinator is a genius and should be our head coach.  Such a childish way of looking at it. But I don't really care because we have no say in it and Tepper is like a child chasing the latest new fad.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aussie Tank said:

That would be court case material after him joining Flores action 

I don’t care for Payton, but giving Wilks another year to prove himself wouldn’t help his court case. The post was “if he sucks” then go get another coach. If he coaches well then he keeps his job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Defensive coaches are a dime a dozen.  Wilks is that.  The landscape is littered with Steve Wilks caliber defensive coaches.  Dom Capers is still coaching for heavens sake!

In this league, creating and keeping an offensive identity is far more important than defense.   The only way to do that is to make sure your head coach is the one who is bringing that identity.  You need an offensive minded coach to set you up for long term success.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilks is clearly leading the team and bringing back the culture that fans know and love. The defense is playing well, the team as a whole seems galvanized, and they're finding ways to win or at least keep games close with the exception of the Bengals beatdown.

I wouldn't hate the hire. The big question mark for me is going to be the offense. Campen has earned his job as far as I'm concerned, but I wouldn't be surprised to see Wilks bring over Cameron Turner from Arizona. Turner is a former QB/WR for The Citadel that was an assistant WR coach for the Panthers from 2015 - 2016 and the assistant QB coach in 2017. He followed Wilks out to Arizona as an offensive assistant (2018), assistant QB coach (2019), assistant QB coach + offensive assistant (2020), QB coach (2021), and is now the QB coach/co-passing game coordinator. He's also Norv Turner's nephew, Scott Turner's cousin. It would fit given Wilks' background in SD + CAR with Ron. 😮

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilkes is playing with the players that Rhule brought in .  He needs a chance to get with Fitts to draft players that fit his style of play and given a full camp to get them ready .   He has the present players behind him and is bringing back the culture we need .  We only need a QB , DE, MLB and perhaps a WR . We can sprinkle in some linemen and a few free agents and we can make a run .  Keep pounding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • BPA comes with the caveat of positional value and roster need included. Never let the latter two completely overwhelm the first, however. Our FO seems to lean heavily into "WEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE POTENTIALZ!!!" as a fourth category and often it seems as the #1 overall pursuit. With as many needs as this roster has, I am not going to get upset over a real roster upgrade at WR versus some reach at EDGE or whatever other extreme needs we have. Overall, I want to see the roster get better. There is far, far, FAR more than one offseason of work left to get this roster into the top 10-12 in the NFL. That should be the goal. 
    • I would say we are more likely to get smoked by Tampa, blast Seattle and then perplexingly lose to Tampa again. 
    • In general, Dave Canales tends to target his TE's the least frequently of any position group(WR/RB/TE) during his three years of running an NFL offense.  However, if you notice this percentage has crept up over time. 2025 is the first year that TE has eclipsed RB in target percentage. Production has also gone up in 2025. This is a percentage of total output in each category. Canales has always used a very TE heavy offense. In fact, on average his offensive formations are 2 or 3 TE sets roughly 80% of all offensive formations. So, the question may be, with this uptick in total TE output, could an elite or top tier TE make a significant impact? I believe there is some evidence this may be the case. Here are a look at TE snaps and Cade Otten specifically. These are the snap percentages for all rostered TE's in every Dave Canales offense. The bolded cell is Cade Otten's whopping 96.46% of total snap counts in the single year he was in the Dave Canales offense in Tampa. This was overwhelmingly his career high. His production was higher with less utilization in 2024, however.    In conclusion, while I don't anticipate ever seeing a top 5 producing/Pro Bowl caliber TE performance in a Dave Canales offense, there does appear to be some evidence that an actual upgrade in our TE room would actually lead to increasing overall offensive efficiency. I think Otten's utilization rate does indicate that the splitting of time between our relatively even TE group would cede significant snaps if a far superior option were available. I believe this is an area we could(and should have this past offseason/draft) made a more concerted effort to get a dynamic TE threat, after the apparent failure that J. Sanders appears to have been.  
×
×
  • Create New...