Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Panthers at Seahawks GameDay Thread


Zod
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Tbe said:


Most games are decided by a score or less.

Regardless, I think Wilks is playing how he HAS TO play. The run game is our strength. We don’t have the QB or WR talent for a pass heavy offense.

thats another thing..hes using what he has and making it work..the dude has shown enough to make me want him as head man..the team actually plays with life now

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ncstatekwi said:

2nd Time today Darnold should have run the ball....for a First/TD

Yep. There was that third down where he clearly had the first but instead threw downfield to Sullivan who barely even contested the ball. A little to Sam’s credit, the big dude looked wide open but did nothing whatsoever with his body to ensure that catch. 

Edited by Jacabee
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Stuart Smith said:

We need receivers that are willing to fight for the ball and get separation. Put Locket and Metcalf on the Panthers it would make an average quarterback look good. 

Blasphemy! All we need is a super-raw rookie QB and look out Super Bowl!!!!

The best catch of the day for the Panthers was TMJ giving the ball a fugg'n leg lock.  Let that crap sink in for a minute. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what else I could've asked for watching the Panthers live the second time. Scoring first, Jacyee Horn INT, Darnold TD, our backs gashing down the field and an actual win on the road against one of our bugaboo teams. Well, ok, giving up a late TD so easily and an onside kick was not ideal but now I could say I watched an attempt live.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Jacabee said:

Yep. There was that third down where he clearly had the first but instead threw downfield to Sullivan who barely even contested the ball. A little to Sam’s credit, the big dude looked wide open but did nothing whatsoever with his body to ensure that catch. 

That's on the TE  both he and tremble failed in this manner today

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Paa Langfart said:

Much as I like wilks I think like Rivera, the game has passed him by.

Why? If it’s because he’s a defensive coach, you still need to defend the other team. 
 

If it’s because he values the run game, you still have to do that as well unless you have a top 5 QB, and even they benefit from the run game. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...