Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can Tepper find anyone better than Wilks?


Saca312
 Share

Recommended Posts

I don't  want a great offensive or defensive mind as a head coach. I want a leader of men who knows and understands football and who does not have an ego when it comes to his colleagues.  I want an offensive genius for an OC and a defensive genius for a DC. They can manage and micro manage as much as they'd like. A HC DOES NOT have that luxury

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Silent Majority said:

I don't  want a great offensive or defensive mind as a head coach. I want a leader of men who knows and understands football and who does not have an ego when it comes to his colleagues.  I want an offensive genius for an OC and a defensive genius for a DC. They can manage and micro manage as much as they'd like. A HC DOES NOT have that luxury

This.

I feel that we should not be moving on from someone who can motivate and maximize the talents of our players. Wilks clearly has this team together and put a fire under them. That's special and something we've NEVER seen Rhule do.

Sure, there are definitely better offensive gurus out there, but they could come in and fail to achieve the level of heart Wilks brings out of these players.

I feel that if we just upgraded our OC and DC to those gurus, but let a leader of men lead this team ala Wilks, we'd be one damn tough team to beat.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For once do our research and try and interview the best possible candidates. If he thinks Wilks is the answer then make it happen. I have an extremely hard time believing the answer has been on our staff the whole time. I really want us to look into some offensive options. 

Edited by Kentucky Panther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it comes down to if tepper thinks sean payton is obtainable

if not then I feel like we go with wilkes. 

DeMeco Ryans will be available but I doubt we'd go after him with Wilkes already winning the locker room over in the interim and having high levels of success as a DC in his own right

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TF330 said:

I think it comes down to if tepper thinks sean payton is obtainable

if not then I feel like we go with wilkes. 

DeMeco Ryans will be available but I doubt we'd go after him with Wilkes already winning the locker room over in the interim and having high levels of success as a DC in his own right

As long as he doesn't dump Wilks for Quinn. That's the only truly cringe hire that's been floated in the media

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Varking said:

The issue will be, if somebody takes the coordinator, can they continue that run of offense? If they drop… that’s the problem. Offensive coordinators who do well get poached by other teams. 

 

That why we create the OC Apprenticeship Program. The apprentice learns the O with the understanding the when the present OC leaves, he's the man. Then he hires his own apprentice. Rinse and repeat. We would never run out of OCs. lol

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • XL could easily be the last dog at the bowl for WR production next year.  That could leave him around 200-300 yards which would be disastrous.
    • Well sure, that's where the disconnect is then. If Thielen only gets 300-400 yards and T-Mac is healthy for the full season, then I'm with you guys, in that scenario there is absolutely zero excuse for him to not put up over 1,000 yards.   In fact, I'll let you double that, if Thielen has only 600 yards, then again, my expectations are for T-Mac to surpass the 1k mark with ease. But his game has never been about his physical abilities, so even if he loses a half a step, he's still the same player who is a savvy route runner who will get open and Bryce will continue to find him due to their chemistry.  Particularly since Bryce isn't a QB who forces things, he takes what the defense gives him.  So when teams focus on T-Mac and Thielen is more free to find those holes in the defense than he has the last two years, I don't think Bryce is going to ignore him. If someone wants to argue for T-Mac getting to 1,000 yards, personally, I'd say those yards would be far more likelier to come from XL and Coker than Thielen.  And that has nothing to do with XL or Coker, but that I'm still a firm believer in Thielen being able to still get 50-60 yards a game, again, particularly as he'll have less defensive attention on him than in either of his 2 seasons with us so far. Just because T-Mac is our #1 of the future who will have the ball forced to him at times, doesn't mean he needs to be forced into that role from day 1 when we have 3 very legitimate WR options next to him. Let the rookie grow into the role and the NFL game, we have that ability to do so because of Thielen, XL, and Coker.
    • Spot on. He's only 20 and his height 6'2 and weight 230lbs might make him more of an off-ball LB possibility. He's a multi-year project
×
×
  • Create New...