Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jim Harbaugh has convo with David Tepper


Daeavorn
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, therealmjl said:

One mistake per decision 

That's probably the most accurate.

35 minutes ago, Chief Keek said:

For years it's been speculation for Harbaugh to be the Panthers HC, now there's real chance that he could be the next HC.

Possible, or it could be one of those things that a load of fans go apesh-t over just to see it not happen.

(see also: Deshaun Watson)

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

The Athletic's Joe Person reports that Panthers owner David Tepper has talked with Michigan coach John Harbaugh about Carolina's head coach position.

Harbaugh has also been linked to the Broncos job and The Athletic had a piece Monday predicting that he would be open to taking an NFL job this offseason. Harbaugh almost got the Vikings job last offseason before they decided to go with Kevin O'Connell and the former 49ers coach had a lot of success in his first go-round as an NFL head coach. The smoke seems to be getting heavy that he'll fill one of the vacancies this offseason

did Person really write John Harbaugh, or you trollin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have liked to have been a fly on the wall for that convo. 

Scott and Tepper: Hi Jim, just curious if you’d have any interest in coming down next week?

Jim: Just put the money in the f*cking bag, Dave. And I want GM rights. 
 

Tepper: Well Scott has out full support.

Jim: We nevermi—

Tepper: Scott you’re fired, and leave this bag for Jim on your way out. 
 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

And what team without a head coach has a promising QB?

None...BUT, since we have apparent "affection" here for guys already on the roster you gotta wonder if he would be fine with being told he would have to work with either Darnold or Corral for next year if QB wasnt a priority. Could influence his decision to come here. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...