Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

AFC team with a QB in place so the pick doesn’t hurt as bad. Owner with plenty of money. They check some boxes definitely…

Good points, maybe.....

AFC is good for the Saints, but that is horrible for Payton himself as the AFC is way ahead of the NFC right now. 

QB is in place, but is that a good thing? Wilson was horrible this year, and honestly has shown regression for a couple years prior. Geno outperformed anything recent from Wilson. In that division you have Mahomes and Herbert who are clearly better than Wilson, and rumors of Tom Brady maybe going to Vegas would put Wilson as the worst QB in the division. If Wilson doesn't play better, you are stuck with contract for a long time and because of that contract the team will be somewhat handcuffed to retain or add pieces

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, travisura said:

I'll be interested to hear what the whispers are after Tepper's meeting with Payton tomorrow.

After? there will be whispers during their meeting even if its just the two of them. Thatds how the 24 hour news cycle works..... makeup poo to get clicks.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

It really sounds like Payton will go to Denver. 

My biggest take away from that clip is how Tom shoots down “Dave will throw everything and is desperate” take down from the get go. I don’t think we as an organization will be desperate like a number of negative Nancy’s around here think.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CmC2k said:

It really sounds like Payton will go to Denver. 

This isn't Pelissaro saying "I'm hearing it's Denver." He's basically doing a process of elimination of available jobs.

Cardinals - out because they already hired a GM

Texans - out because of Nick Caserio.

Panthers - out because the trade will cost too much

Broncos - only one left. Pelisaro feels Broncos ownership will be more willing to part with the picks for the trade.

[edit to say I'm not stumping for Payton or anything, I just don't think this report by Pelissaro supports the conclusion "it's going to be Denver."]

Edited by trueblade
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

AFC team with a QB in place so the pick doesn’t hurt as bad. Owner with plenty of money. They check some boxes definitely…

Coaches talk too. I'd be stunned if Payton doesn't chat with Pete Carroll about Russ. If he does, we can probably guess whose word will matter more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright it's time for Tepper to focus 100000% on Steichen and Kafka. Like go to the Saturday night game and just walk sideline to sideline hitting them up. Have one of them ready to go, ready to assemble their staff as soon as their season is done. Because right now he is going to end up with Steve Wilks and a LOT of empty seats at BOA next season if he keeps up this SP nonsense.

Edited by Sean Payton's Vicodin
  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...